Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

12:04
Assessment of the Cytotoxic and Immunomodulatory Effects of Substances in Human Precision-cut Lung Slices
Published on: May 9, 2018
Optimised testing strategies for skin sensitization--the LLNA and beyond
David Basketter1, Jonathan Crozier, Bruno Hubesch
1DABMEB Consultancy Ltd., Sharnbrook, UK. dabmebconsultancyltd@me.com
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology : RTP
|June 21, 2012
Summary
The local lymph node assay (LLNA) for skin sensitization testing has limitations. Research is advancing alternative in vitro methods and (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationship ((Q)SAR) tools for safer, non-animal toxicology.
Area of Science:
- Toxicology
- Dermatology
- In vitro testing
Background:
- The 21st-century toxicology field is shifting towards non-animal testing methods.
- Skin sensitization assessment is a key area for developing alternative methods.
- The widely used in vivo Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) has known limitations, including false positives and negatives.
Framework:
- Review of the LLNA's performance and limitations.
- Exploration of weight-of-evidence approaches for classification, labeling, and risk assessment.
- Assessment of the current status and progress of alternative testing strategies.
Implementation:
- Progress in developing in vitro methods for hazard identification, with some nearing validation.
- Recognition that (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationship ((Q)SAR) tools require further development for widespread practical use.
- Challenges remain in testing lipophilic substances and developing non-animal methods for potency assessment.
Implications:
- The findings support the transition towards validated non-animal methods for skin sensitization.
- Continued research and development are necessary to address remaining challenges in alternative toxicology.
- Enhanced risk assessment and regulatory compliance can be achieved through improved testing strategies.

