Protocol for measuring carotid intima-media thickness that best correlates with cardiovascular risk and target organ

Manuel A Gómez-Marcos1, José I Recio-Rodríguez, María C Patino-Alonso

  • 1Primary Care Research Unit, La Alamedilla, University of Salamanca, Sacyl. REDIAPP, IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain. magomez@usal.es

Insights

The mean common carotid intima-media thickness (CC-IMT) measurement best predicts cardiovascular risk and target organ damage. This protocol involves averaging 120 measures across both carotid arteries, enhancing cardiovascular risk assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Vascular Biology
  • Diagnostic Imaging

Background:

  • Cardiovascular risk stratification and target organ damage (TOD) assessment are crucial in managing hypertensive and diabetic patients.
  • Common carotid intima-media thickness (CC-IMT) is a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis.
  • Identifying the optimal CC-IMT measurement for predicting cardiovascular risk (CVR) and TOD is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine which CC-IMT measurement best correlates with overall cardiovascular risk (CVR) and vascular, cardiac, and renal target organ damage (TOD).
  • To compare different CC-IMT measurement protocols in diabetic, hypertensive, and healthy subjects.

Main Methods:

  • A cross-sectional study included 305 participants (113 hypertensive, 100 diabetic, 92 healthy), aged 30-75 years.
  • Evaluated mean and maximum CC-IMT, ankle-brachial index (ABI), pulse wave velocity (PWV), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), albumin/creatinine ratio, and Cornell voltage-duration product (VDP).
  • Cardiovascular risk was assessed using the Framingham equation and SCORE models.

Main Results:

  • CC-IMT demonstrated positive correlations with CVR, PWV, and Cornell VDP, and negative correlations with ABI and GFR (P < 0.001).
  • Mean CC-IMT showed the highest odds ratio (OR) for TOD (1.85), while maximum CC-IMT in posterior projections had the lowest (1.42).
  • Each unit increase in mean CC-IMT predicted a 1.98-fold increase in risk (Framingham), significantly higher than maximum CC-IMT.

Conclusions:

  • The optimal CC-IMT measurement protocol for predicting TOD and CVR (Framingham) is the mean of 120 measures.
  • This protocol involves averaging mean values from near and far walls across all three projections of both carotid arteries.
  • This standardized approach enhances the accuracy of cardiovascular risk assessment.
Abstract