Molecular biology and leukaemia diagnosis

The diagnosis and classification of leukaemia started with simple morphological examination and now embraces use of special stains, cytochemistry and immunophenotyping. Genetic studies have progressed from karyotyping to detection of genetic changes within genes. The methods described in this chapter are still at an early stage of development and, so far, have provided relatively little in the way of an extension of available diagnostic information. Sometimes the methods provide extensions to existing techniques, for example by the detection of bcr rearrangements in patients who have CML or ALL but do not have a detectable Philadelphia chromosome. Another example is retrospective diagnosis of gene rearrangements using DNA from slide preparations. However, it should be noted that it has only very recently been shown that there is likely to be a causal relationship between the Ph chromosome and leukaemia. Daley et al (1990) induced CML in mice by bone marrow transplantation of cells infected with a retrovirus encoding P210bcr/abl and Heisterkamp et al (1990) produced mice transgenic for a BCR/ABL P190 DNA construct and showed that the progeny died of acute leukaemia (mostly ALL). We have not summarized studies of the incidence of activated oncogenes such as RAS in leukaemia and myelodysplasia. Such oncogenes appear to be involved in many tumours and may well indicate either a predisposition to cancer or a particular stage of malignancy, but their analysis does not at present help in making a diagnosis. It is likely that, as we understand more about the nature of the malignant process, we shall be able to use genetic techniques to enhance considerably both diagnostic and prognostic precision.