Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sound Intensity Level00:53

Sound Intensity Level

Humans perceive sound by hearing. The human ear helps sound waves reach the brain, which then interprets the waves and creates the perception of hearing. The loudness of the environment in which a person is located determines whether they can distinguish between different sound sources.
The human ear can perceive an extensive range of sound intensity, necessitating the use of the logarithmic scale to define a physical quantity—the intensity level. It is a ratio of two intensities and hence a...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Three Cases of Recovery from Sensorineural Hearing Loss in the First Year of Life: Implications for Monitoring and Management.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2021
Same author

Multidimensional Timbre Spaces of Cochlear Implant Vocoded and Non-vocoded Synthetic Female Singing Voices.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2020
Same author

Influences of cognitive load on sensorimotor contributions to working memory: An EEG investigation of mu rhythm activity during speech discrimination.

Neurobiology of learning and memory·2019
Same author

Sex differences in early sensorimotor processing for speech discrimination.

Scientific reports·2019
Same author

EEG mu rhythms: Rich sources of sensorimotor information in speech processing.

Brain and language·2018
Same author

Trait related sensorimotor deficits in people who stutter: An EEG investigation of <i>μ</i> rhythm dynamics during spontaneous fluency.

NeuroImage. Clinical·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2026

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

Acceptable noise level and psychophysical masking.

Dania A Rishiq1, Ashley W Harkrider, Mark S Hedrick

  • 1University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Knoxville, TN, USA.

American Journal of Audiology
|June 22, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Individuals with low acceptable noise levels (ANLs) may have reduced auditory cortical responsiveness. This suggests a potential link between ANLs and decreased sustained attention, impacting noise tolerance.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics

Background:

  • Acceptable Noise Levels (ANLs) describe an individual's tolerance to background noise.
  • Understanding the neural basis of ANLs is crucial for addressing noise sensitivity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether afferent or efferent cortical pathways more significantly influence ANLs.
  • To compare temporal masking responses between individuals with low and high ANLs.

Main Methods:

  • 19 normal-hearing adults (10 low ANL, 9 high ANL) participated.
  • Tone-in-noise simultaneous, forward, and backward masking tasks were employed.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences in masked thresholds were found between low and high ANL groups.

More Related Videos

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents
09:23

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents

Published on: October 16, 2012

Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs
09:25

Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs

Published on: January 6, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2026

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents
09:23

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents

Published on: October 16, 2012

Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs
09:25

Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs

Published on: January 6, 2023

  • The low ANL group required more threshold runs, indicating potential differences in response stability.
  • Conclusions:

    • Low ANLs appear associated with reduced afferent cortical responsiveness.
    • Findings suggest a possible link between low ANLs and diminished sustained attention.