Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Measurement of Tissue Oxygenation Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis
Published on: October 2, 2020
Treatment outcomes for ischemic heart disease in dialysis-dependent patients
Alexander Yeates1, Carmel Hawley, Julie Mundy
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, and Department of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. asyeates@gmail.com
Insights
For dialysis patients with ischemic heart disease, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) offers better quality of life and fewer adverse events than stenting. Treatment decisions should be guided by symptoms and coronary anatomy.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nephrology
- Outcomes Research
Background:
- Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a leading cause of death in dialysis-dependent patients.
- Optimal treatment strategies for IHD in this population remain unclear, despite common interventions like revascularization and medical management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of different interventions for dialysis-dependent patients suffering from ischemic heart disease.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study of 90 dialysis-dependent patients with IHD from 1999-2009.
- Patients were divided into three groups: best medical management (35), percutaneous coronary angioplasty with stenting (31), and coronary artery bypass grafting (24).
- Median follow-up was 24 months, utilizing Kaplan-Meier analysis for time-to-event data.
Main Results:
- Both stenting and CABG showed lower risks of adverse outcomes compared to medical management.
- Overall mortality was 44.4%, with smoking and logistic EuroSCORE predicting mortality.
- Coronary artery bypass grafting resulted in significantly better quality of life and physical function compared to stenting or medical management, despite similar overall mortality rates.
Conclusions:
- Dialysis-dependent patients with IHD experience poor survival even after interventions.
- Coronary artery bypass grafting demonstrates superior outcomes in terms of composite adverse events and quality of life compared to stenting.
- Treatment choices should be individualized based on patient symptoms and coronary anatomy.
Objective:
To compare outcomes following intervention in dialysis-dependent patients with ischemic heart disease.
Background:
Ischemic heart disease is a major cause of mortality in dialysis-dependent patients. Coronary revascularization and medical modification to relieve symptoms is common, however, there is no clear consensus regarding optimal treatment.
Method:
Ninety dialysis-dependent patients with ischemic heart disease were prospectively assessed between 1999 and 2009, with a median follow-up of 24 months; 35 received best medical management, 31 had percutaneous coronary angioplasty and stenting, and 24 had coronary artery bypass grafting.
Results:
By multivariate analysis, higher body mass index and lower logistic EuroSCORE were associated with having either procedure compared to medical management. Using the time-to-event Kaplan-Meier method, both stenting and coronary bypass grafting had lower risks of an adverse outcome than best medical management. Mortality was 40/90 (44.4%). Multivariate predictors of mortality were smoking and a logistic EuroSCORE of 7-14. Overall mortality was not different among groups, however, the stent group had a survival advantage at 30-days and 1-year compared to the coronary bypass group. Composite median survival was 52.3 months. SF-36 questionnaires showed quality of life after bypass grafting was significantly better than medical management or stenting. Physical function was better after bypass grafting compared to medical management or stenting.
Conclusion:
Dialysis-dependent patients with ischemic heart disease have poor survival despite intervention. Coronary artery bypass achieves fewer composite adverse events and better quality of life than stenting. Symptoms and coronary anatomy should dictate treatment decisions in dialysis-dependent patients.
Related Concept Videos
Dialysis
Acute kidney injury develops suddenly and can be caused by pre-renal causes (e.g., hypovolemia, shock), intrinsic renal causes (e.g., acute tubular necrosis), or post-renal causes (e.g., urinary obstruction). In contrast, chronic renal failure progresses gradually over time and is often...
Dialysis
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
