Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
Attribution01:26

Attribution

In social interactions, individuals frequently seek to understand the motivations and causes behind others' behaviors. This fundamental aspect of social perception, known as attribution, plays a crucial role in shaping interpersonal relationships and guiding future actions. Attribution refers to the cognitive process through which people infer the reasons behind others' behaviors, allowing them to assess character traits, intentions, and situational influences.Attribution Theory and Its...
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Navigating the boundary between 'normative' and 'non-normative' collective action: A British case study of the removal of a public statue associated with racism.

The British journal of social psychology·2026
Same author

Being out of sync in academia: psychological, sleep-related and chronobiological factors associated with burnout in higher education students.

Sleep medicine·2026
Same author

From who we are to what we are willing to do for social change: The action-bound role of efficacy perceptions.

The British journal of social psychology·2025
Same author

Building bridges with awe: Exploring underlying mechanisms and moderators of the relationship between awe and prejudice towards sexual minority group members.

The British journal of social psychology·2025
Same author

Understanding and harnessing intergroup contact in educational contexts.

The British journal of social psychology·2025
Same author

How prototypical are we compared to them? The role of the group relative prototypicality in explaining the path from intergroup contact to collective action.

The British journal of social psychology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

Can intergroup contact improve humanity attributions?

Dora Capozza1, Elena Trifiletti, Loris Vezzali

  • 1Department of Applied Psychology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy. dora.capozza@unipd.it

International Journal of Psychology : Journal International De Psychologie
|June 23, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Intergroup contact reduces prejudice by decreasing group distinctions and fostering shared identity, leading to lower anxiety and increased empathy towards outgroups. This strategy promotes outgroup humanization across diverse social contexts.

More Related Videos

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement (PMSM), for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement (PMSM), for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement (PMSM), for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement (PMSM), for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Intergroup Relations
  • Prejudice Reduction

Background:

  • Intergroup contact is a key strategy for improving intergroup relations.
  • Understanding the psychological mechanisms linking contact to positive intergroup attitudes is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate intergroup contact as a strategy for enhancing outgroup humanization.
  • To test a double-mediation model explaining how contact influences perceptions of outgroups.

Main Methods:

  • Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the proposed mediation model.
  • The model was tested in two distinct intergroup contexts: Italians vs. immigrants and Northern Italians vs. Southern Italians.

Main Results:

  • Intergroup contact was associated with reduced salience of intergroup boundaries and adoption of a common identity.
  • These recategorization processes mediated the effects of contact on reduced anxiety and increased empathy.
  • Emotions and group representations significantly mediated the link between contact and outgroup humanization.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support the double-mediation model, demonstrating how intergroup contact fosters positive intergroup attitudes.
  • Intergroup contact effectively promotes outgroup humanization by altering group representations and emotional responses.
  • The study highlights practical implications for interventions aimed at reducing prejudice and enhancing social cohesion.