Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

09:32
Time-Resolved, Dynamic Computed Tomography Angiography for Characterization of Aortic Endoleaks and Treatment Guidance via 2D-3D Fusion-Imaging
Published on: December 9, 2021
Intraprocedure aneurysm rupture in embolization: clinical outcome with imaging correlation
Chao-Bao Luo1, Michael Mu-Huo Teng, Feng-Chi Chang
1Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC. cbluo@vghtpe.gov.tw
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA
|June 23, 2012
Summary
Intraprocedural aneurysm rupture (IPAR) during embolization is rare but serious. Angiographic hemodynamics and brain CT are key for predicting outcomes in patients experiencing IPAR.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Interventional Radiology
- Vascular Neurology
Background:
- Intraprocedural aneurysm rupture (IPAR) is a significant complication during endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms.
- This study investigates the immediate and long-term imaging and clinical outcomes of IPAR.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the incidence, causes, and imaging findings of IPAR during intracranial aneurysm embolization.
- To correlate imaging findings and hemodynamic compromise with clinical outcomes following IPAR.
- To evaluate the utility of brain CT in monitoring IPAR progression and tissue loss.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 376 patients with 412 intracranial aneurysms treated with coil embolization over 9 years.
- Identification of 10 patients (2.7%) who experienced IPAR.
- Review of immediate cerebral angiography and brain CT, plus follow-up CT; clinical outcomes assessed using the modified Rankin scale (mRS).
Main Results:
- IPAR causes included coil protrusion (70%), microcatheter perforation (20%), and spontaneous rupture (10%).
- Angiographic cerebral hemodynamic compromise occurred in 40% of patients, correlating with poor outcomes.
- Immediate CT showed contrast media/hemorrhage expansion; 60% of patients had cerebral tissue loss on follow-up CT.
- Long-term outcomes: 60% good recovery (mRS ≤ 2), 10% moderate disability (mRS 4), 30% mortality (mRS 6).
Conclusions:
- IPAR is an infrequent complication, often occurring during coil deployment.
- Angiographic hemodynamics is a critical predictor of IPAR outcomes.
- Brain CT effectively visualizes IPAR progression and associated ischemic or hemorrhagic tissue damage.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Thoracic, aortic arch and abdominal aneurysms are significant vascular conditions that can present with various clinical manifestations and lead to serious complications. Understanding these manifestations and the appropriate diagnostic studies is essential for effective management and treatment.Thoracic Aortic AneurysmsThoracic aortic aneurysms often remain asymptomatic until they reach a size that impinges on adjacent structures. They typically cause deep, diffuse chest pain that radiates to...
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm management involves either conservative medical therapy or surgical intervention, depending on the size and symptoms of the aneurysm. Conservative management is generally reserved for smaller, asymptomatic aneurysms, while larger or symptomatic aneurysms often necessitate surgical repair.Conservative Medical TherapyFor small, asymptomatic aneurysms, particularly abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) less than 5.5 centimeters in diameter, conservative medical therapy is recommended. This...
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Vigilant monitoring for aneurysm rupture is essential for patients undergoing aortic surgery.Preoperative Nursing ManagementContinuously monitor the patient for manifestations of aneurysm rupture, such as pallor, weakness, tachycardia, hypotension, abdominal, back, groin, or periumbilical pain, changes in consciousness, and a pulsating abdominal mass. Regularly assess the patient's peripheral pulses.Instruct the patient to consume a clear liquid diet the day before surgery and administer...
