Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Morphological and Functional Assessment of the Right Ventricle Using 3D Echocardiography
Published on: October 28, 2020
Assessment of left ventricular outflow gradient: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy versus aortic valvular stenosis
Jeffrey B Geske1, Michael W Cullen, Paul Sorajja
1Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Insights
In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), peak instantaneous and peak-to-peak gradients strongly correlate and can both assess obstruction severity. For aortic stenosis (AS), mean gradient is the key metric for clinical management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hemodynamics
- Cardiovascular Imaging
Background:
- Aortic stenosis (AS) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are distinct conditions affecting the heart's outflow tract.
- In AS, mean pressure gradient accurately reflects obstruction severity, unlike peak-to-peak or peak instantaneous gradients.
- The optimal method for quantifying outflow obstruction in HCM remains unclear due to its unique pathophysiology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare peak-to-peak, peak instantaneous, and mean pressure gradients in patients with HCM and AS.
- To determine the most reliable method for assessing pressure gradients in HCM and AS.
Main Methods:
- Cardiac catheterization was performed in 50 patients with HCM and 50 patients with AS.
- High-fidelity micromanometer-tip catheters were used for HCM patients, measuring left ventricular inflow and central aortic pressures.
- Simultaneous left ventricular and central aortic pressures were recorded in AS patients.
Main Results:
- In HCM, peak instantaneous and peak-to-peak gradients showed a strong linear correlation (R² = 0.98).
- In AS, the correlation between peak instantaneous and peak-to-peak gradients was weaker (R² = 0.70).
- Both peak-to-peak and peak instantaneous gradients were higher than the mean gradient in HCM.
Conclusions:
- Peak instantaneous and peak-to-peak gradients are reliable for assessing obstruction severity in HCM.
- Mean gradient is the preferred measure for guiding clinical management in AS.
- Different gradient measurements are appropriate for evaluating obstruction in HCM versus AS.
Objectives:
This study examined the relationship between peak-to-peak (common invasive measurement), peak instantaneous (common Doppler measurement), and mean pressure gradients in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and aortic stenosis (AS).
Background:
In patients with AS, the peak-to-peak gradient and peak instantaneous gradient are discrepant, and the mean gradient best represents obstruction severity. The pathophysiology of outflow obstruction differs in HCM, with the maximum gradient occurring in late systole, thus the optimal method for quantifying gradient severity in HCM remains undefined.
Methods:
Fifty patients with HCM and 50 patients with AS underwent gradient characterization at cardiac catheterization (age 55 ± 15 years vs. 72 ± 9 years; 48% vs. 42% male, respectively). All HCM patients were studied with high-fidelity, micromanometer-tip catheters and transseptal measurement of left ventricular inflow and central aortic pressures. In AS, simultaneous left ventricular and central aortic pressures were recorded.
Results:
The peak instantaneous gradient was linearly correlated with peak-to-peak gradient in HCM (R(2) = 0.98, p < 0.0001), with the relationship close to the line of identity. In AS, more scatter and further deviation from the line of identity occurred when comparing the peak instantaneous gradient to the peak-to-peak gradient (R(2) = 0.70, p < 0.0001). Both peak-to-peak and peak instantaneous gradients were consistently higher than the mean gradient in HCM, with wide 95% confidence limits of agreement (26.7 ± 46.5 mm Hg and 16.4 ± 47.2 mm Hg, respectively).
Conclusions:
In HCM, peak instantaneous and peak-to-peak gradient demonstrate excellent correlation. Consequently, both peak instantaneous and peak-to-peak gradients can be used to classify obstruction severity in HCM. By contrast, the mean gradient should direct clinical management in AS.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction

