Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Functional Neuroimaging Using Ultrasonic Blood-brain Barrier Disruption and Manganese-enhanced MRI
Published on: July 12, 2012
Application of a multi-route physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for manganese to evaluate dose-dependent
Jeffry D Schroeter1, David C Dorman, Miyoung Yoon
1The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA. jschroeter@ara.com
Abstract:
Manganese (Mn) is an essential element that is neurotoxic under certain exposure conditions. Monkeys and humans exposed to Mn develop similar neurological effects; thus, an improved understanding of the dose-response relationship seen in nonhuman primates could inform the human health risk assessment for this essential metal. A previous analysis of this dose-response relationship in experimental animals (Gwiazda, R., Lucchini, R., and Smith, D., 2007, Adequacy and consistency of animal studies to evaluate the neurotoxicity of chronic low-level manganese exposure in humans, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 70, 594-605.) relied on estimates of cumulative intake of Mn as the sole measure for comparison across studies with different doses, durations, and exposure routes. In this study, a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model that accurately accounts for the dose dependencies of Mn distribution was used to estimate increases in brain Mn concentrations in monkeys following Mn exposure. Experimental studies evaluated in the analysis included exposures by inhalation, oral, iv, ip, and sc dose routes, and spanned durations ranging from several weeks to over 2 years. This analysis confirms that the dose-response relationship for the neurotoxic effects of Mn in monkeys is independent of exposure route and supports the use of target tissue Mn concentration or cumulative target tissue Mn as the appropriate dose metric for these comparisons. These results also provide strong evidence of a dose-dependent transition in the mode of action for the neurological effects of Mn that needs to be considered in risk assessments for this essential metal.
Insights
Manganese (Mn) neurotoxicity in monkeys shows a clear dose-response relationship, independent of exposure route. Brain manganese concentration is the key metric for assessing human health risks from this essential metal.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Health
- Neurotoxicology
- Toxicokinetics
Background:
- Manganese (Mn) is essential but neurotoxic at certain levels.
- Monkeys and humans exhibit similar Mn-induced neurological effects.
- Previous risk assessments relied on cumulative intake, overlooking dose-response complexities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To refine the dose-response relationship for Mn neurotoxicity in nonhuman primates.
- To establish appropriate dose metrics for human health risk assessment.
- To investigate Mn distribution and its impact on neurological effects.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for Mn distribution.
- Analyzed experimental studies with diverse exposure routes (inhalation, oral, iv, ip, sc) and durations (weeks to over 2 years).
- Estimated brain Mn concentrations following Mn exposure in monkeys.
Main Results:
- The dose-response relationship for Mn neurotoxicity in monkeys is independent of the exposure route.
- Brain Mn concentration or cumulative brain Mn is a suitable dose metric.
- Evidence suggests a dose-dependent shift in the mechanism of Mn's neurological effects.
Conclusions:
- Target tissue Mn concentration is a reliable metric for assessing Mn neurotoxicity.
- Findings support improved human health risk assessments for Mn exposure.
- Understanding the dose-dependent mode of action is crucial for Mn risk management.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Pharmacodynamic Models: Linear Concentration–Effect Model
Drug Toxicity: Dose-Dependent Reactions
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses

