Application of a multi-route physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for manganese to evaluate dose-dependent

Jeffry D Schroeter1, David C Dorman, Miyoung Yoon

  • 1The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA. jschroeter@ara.com

Insights

Manganese (Mn) neurotoxicity in monkeys shows a clear dose-response relationship, independent of exposure route. Brain manganese concentration is the key metric for assessing human health risks from this essential metal.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Health
  • Neurotoxicology
  • Toxicokinetics

Background:

  • Manganese (Mn) is essential but neurotoxic at certain levels.
  • Monkeys and humans exhibit similar Mn-induced neurological effects.
  • Previous risk assessments relied on cumulative intake, overlooking dose-response complexities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To refine the dose-response relationship for Mn neurotoxicity in nonhuman primates.
  • To establish appropriate dose metrics for human health risk assessment.
  • To investigate Mn distribution and its impact on neurological effects.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for Mn distribution.
  • Analyzed experimental studies with diverse exposure routes (inhalation, oral, iv, ip, sc) and durations (weeks to over 2 years).
  • Estimated brain Mn concentrations following Mn exposure in monkeys.

Main Results:

  • The dose-response relationship for Mn neurotoxicity in monkeys is independent of the exposure route.
  • Brain Mn concentration or cumulative brain Mn is a suitable dose metric.
  • Evidence suggests a dose-dependent shift in the mechanism of Mn's neurological effects.

Conclusions:

  • Target tissue Mn concentration is a reliable metric for assessing Mn neurotoxicity.
  • Findings support improved human health risk assessments for Mn exposure.
  • Understanding the dose-dependent mode of action is crucial for Mn risk management.

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model01:29

Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model

Pharmacodynamic models are essential tools in understanding the relationship between drug concentrations and their effects on biological systems. By characterizing the dynamics of drug action, these models guide dose selection, optimize therapeutic efficacy, and inform the development of new drugs. Two major classes of pharmacodynamic models include direct effect and indirect response models.Direct Effect ModelsDirect effect models describe the immediate relationship between drug concentration...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions01:15

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF).
Pharmacodynamic Models: Linear Concentration–Effect Model01:15

Pharmacodynamic Models: Linear Concentration–Effect Model

The linear concentration–effect model, underpinned by the principle that pharmacological effect (E) is directly proportional to plasma drug concentration (C), emerges as a pivotal simplification of the Emax model for conditions where C is significantly less than EC50. This model portrays a linear trajectory of the concentration–effect relationship when drug levels are markedly below the EC50 threshold.Despite its inherent assumption of continuous effect augmentation with increasing drug...
Drug Toxicity: Dose-Dependent Reactions01:24

Drug Toxicity: Dose-Dependent Reactions

Drug toxicities can be stratified into pharmacological, pathological, or genotoxic based on their mechanisms. The incidence and severity of these toxicities generally increase with the drug's concentration in the body and exposure time.Pharmacological toxicity is evident when the therapeutic effects of drugs overshoot into adverse reactions in a predictable, dose-dependent manner. Central nervous system (CNS) depression from barbiturates is a classic example, with effects escalating from...
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses01:25

Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses

A loading dose is an essential pharmacological strategy to rapidly achieve the target plasma drug concentration necessary for an immediate therapeutic effect. This approach is especially critical for drugs characterized by slow absorption or extended half-lives, where delaying therapeutic plasma levels could compromise treatment outcomes. By administering a loading dose, clinicians ensure a prompt onset of drug action, even for agents with complex pharmacokinetic profiles.Achieving steady-state...