Ability of S100B to predict severity and cranial CT results in children with TBI

Lynn Babcock1, Terri Byczkowski, Sohug Mookerjee

  • 1Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA. lynn.babcock@cchmc.org

Brain Injury
|June 26, 2012
PubMed

Insights

Elevated S100B levels in children with traumatic brain injury (TBI) may indicate injury severity and abnormal CT scans. However, S100B is not a reliable standalone screening tool for identifying children with mild TBI requiring a CT scan.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Emergency Medicine
  • Neurotrauma Biomarkers
  • Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

Background:

  • Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in children.
  • Accurate and timely assessment of TBI severity and the need for neuroimaging is crucial in pediatric patients.
  • S100B protein is a potential biomarker for brain injury, but its utility in pediatric TBI requires further evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the predictive capability of S100B protein levels for TBI severity in children.
  • To determine if S100B can predict abnormal cranial CT findings in pediatric TBI cases.
  • To evaluate the clinical utility of S100B as a screening tool for cranial CT in mild TBI.

Main Methods:

  • Secondary analysis of a cohort of pediatric patients (<19 years) presenting with TBI within 6 hours of injury.
  • Inclusion criteria: cranial CT scan and blood drawn for S100B analysis.
  • Statistical analysis to compare S100B levels based on TBI severity (GCS) and CT findings.

Main Results:

  • S100B levels were significantly higher in children with moderate/severe TBI compared to mild TBI (0.281 vs 0.053 µg/L).
  • Elevated S100B levels correlated with abnormal cranial CT findings (0.210 vs 0.036 µg/L, p=0.03).
  • S100B showed moderate predictive ability for abnormal CT (AUC=0.72) but not for patients with GCS of 15.

Conclusions:

  • S100B protein shows potential in predicting TBI severity and abnormal CT scans in children.
  • S100B alone may not be sufficiently clinically useful to independently screen children with mild TBI for cranial CT.
  • Further research may explore S100B in conjunction with other clinical factors for improved diagnostic accuracy.
Abstract