Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
Obedience01:08

Obedience

According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation, obedience...
Milgram's Obedience to Authority02:20

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
Deindividuation00:57

Deindividuation

Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

US budget 'freezes' spending on research.

Nature·2018
Same author

Scientists should not resign themselves to Brexit.

Nature·2017
Same author

The elephant in the room we can't ignore.

Nature·2016
Same author

Time to cry out for academic freedom.

Nature·2015
Same author

Rejection of GM crops is not a failure for science.

Nature·2015
Same author

The future of science will soon be upon us.

Nature·2015

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2026

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

Scientific misconduct: more cops, more robbers?

Colin Macilwain

    Cell
    |June 26, 2012
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The scientific community is addressing research misconduct, previously underestimated. Broadening the definition may offer a solution for minimizing and policing scientific integrity.

    More Related Videos

    Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
    09:49

    Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

    Published on: December 24, 2015

    An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
    07:36

    An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

    Published on: May 3, 2016

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: May 12, 2026

    The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
    09:12

    The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

    Published on: July 4, 2013

    Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
    09:49

    Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

    Published on: December 24, 2015

    An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
    07:36

    An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

    Published on: May 3, 2016

    Area of Science:

    • Scientific Integrity
    • Research Ethics
    • Academic Misconduct

    Background:

    • Historically, research misconduct was considered too rare to warrant significant attention.
    • The scientific community is now actively seeking methods to minimize and police research misconduct.
    • There is a growing recognition of the need for robust systems to uphold scientific standards.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore strategies for minimizing and policing research misconduct within the scientific community.
    • To investigate the potential of broadening the definition of research misconduct as a key strategy.
    • To assess the implications of redefining research misconduct for scientific practice and oversight.

    Main Methods:

    • This study involves a conceptual analysis of existing definitions of research misconduct.
    • It examines the potential impact of expanding these definitions on detection and prevention.
    • The research considers policy implications and community responses to definitional changes.

    Main Results:

    • Broadening the definition of research misconduct could enhance its detectability and measurability.
    • A wider scope may encourage more proactive measures against scientific errors and fraud.
    • This approach could foster a more rigorous and accountable research environment.

    Conclusions:

    • Expanding the definition of research misconduct is a viable strategy for improving oversight.
    • Proactive policing and minimization efforts are crucial for maintaining public trust in science.
    • A re-evaluation of what constitutes misconduct is essential for the future of scientific integrity.