Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Radial keratotomy: procedures.

J B Robin1

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago.

Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
|July 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Radial keratotomy, a surgical procedure for vision correction, has remained largely unchanged since its introduction in 1978. This review examines potential variations in its six fundamental surgical steps.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor in chronic myeloid leukemia: a retrospective cohort in east occitania.

Annals of hematology·2022
Same author

Evaluation of diclofenac sodium 0.1% ophthalmic solution in the treatment of ocular symptoms after bilateral radial keratotomy.

Cornea·1997
Same author

Analysis of corneal topography after automated lamellar keratoplasty.

Ophthalmology·1997
Same author

Corneal graft rejection episode after excimer laser phototherapeutic keratectomy.

Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·1994
Same author

Hexagonal keratotomy.

Refractive & corneal surgery·1992
Same author

Herpes simplex keratitis in renal transplant patients.

The British journal of ophthalmology·1991
Same journal

Eye injury rates and community cost savings through vision centers: Evidence from southern India.

Indian journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of the protective efficiency of polycarbonate goggles against firecracker-related ocular injuries.

Indian journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Comment on: Clinical characteristics, risk factor analysis, and outcomes of graft rejection after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Indian journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Issue regarding E Log book for PG students: Paper to pixels.

Indian journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Methylation matters: A case control study on epigenetic alteration in diabetic retinopathy.

Indian journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Understanding the disconnect: A pilot study of public perception versus reality of corneal donation in India.

Indian journal of ophthalmology·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Surgical Procedures
  • Corneal Surgery

Background:

  • Radial keratotomy (RK) is a refractive surgical procedure that utilizes corneal incisions to correct myopia.
  • The fundamental technique, developed by Fyodorov and introduced to the US in 1978, has seen minimal procedural evolution.
  • Understanding variations in RK is crucial for optimizing surgical outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the established procedure of radial keratotomy.
  • To analyze potential variations within each of the six core surgical steps of radial keratotomy.
  • To evaluate the pros and cons associated with these variations.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive literature review was conducted.
  • The review focused on variations in the six key steps of radial keratotomy: anesthesia, visual axis marking, optical zone marking, corneal thickness measurement, blade depth setting, and corneal incision marking.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Pros and cons of each variation were considered.
  • Main Results:

    • The core surgical technique for radial keratotomy remains largely consistent with the original Fyodorov method.
    • Potential variations exist within each of the six fundamental steps, influencing surgical precision and outcomes.
    • Analysis of these variations is essential for refining the procedure.

    Conclusions:

    • Radial keratotomy is a long-standing procedure with a stable surgical technique.
    • Exploring variations in RK steps offers opportunities for improved patient results.
    • Further investigation into the benefits and drawbacks of RK variations is warranted.