Related Experiment Videos
Causal structure and hierarchies of models
1Department of Economics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27278, USA. kd.hoover@duke.edu
Summary
Economics often seeks complete causal explanations but sometimes uses simpler models. This study explores Herbert Simon
Area of Science:
- Economics
- Causation
- Econometrics
Background:
- Economics traditionally prefers comprehensive explanations, favoring general over partial equilibrium and microfoundations over aggregate models.
- Probabilistic causation theories often prioritize detailed causal accounts, similar to resolutions of Simpson's paradox and causal refinement strategies.
- Countervailing practices exist in economics, such as representative-agent models and smaller-scale structural vector-autoregression (SVAR) and dynamic stochastic general-equilibrium (DSGE) models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the tension between the preference for complete causal explanations and the practical use of simplified models in economics.
- To explore a structural account of causation, inspired by Herbert Simon, for understanding complex economic systems.
- To investigate the constraints on modeling complex systems as simpler ones and the integration of piecemeal evidence.
Main Methods:
- Utilizes a structural account of causation, drawing on Herbert Simon's work.
- Analyzes the relationship between complete systems and incomplete systems in economic modeling.
- Examines the role of exogenous and endogenous variables in partitioning economic systems.
Main Results:
- Identifies constraints imposed by a structural causation account on simplifying complex or lower-order economic systems.
- Assesses the extent to which piecemeal evidence can be incorporated into structural causal accounts.
- Highlights the practical preference for smaller-scale econometric models despite theoretical inclinations towards completeness.
Conclusions:
- A structural account of causation provides a framework for reconciling the desire for detailed explanations with the necessity of using simplified models in economics.
- Understanding these constraints is crucial for developing robust economic models that effectively incorporate available evidence.
- The study contributes to a deeper understanding of causal inference in economics, particularly when dealing with complex systems and limited data.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models
Mechanistic models, a category encompassing both physiological and compartmental modeling, differ from empirical models' approaches to incorporating known factors about the systems being modeled. Empirical models describe data with minimal assumptions, while mechanistic models aim to provide a robust description of available data by specifying assumptions and integrating known factors about the system. Compartmental analysis is a key example of a mechanistic model in pharmacokinetics and...
Schemata
A schema is a mental construct that organizes related concepts, allowing the brain to process information efficiently. Upon activation, schemata facilitate assumptions about people or objects.
Two types of schemata are:
Two types of schemata are:
Models, Theories, and Laws
Scientists frequently use models to help them comprehend a specific collection of phenomena. In physics, a model is a condensed version of a physical system that is too complex to study thoroughly. One such example is the light wave model; unlike water waves, light waves are typically invisible to us. Nonetheless, it is helpful to think of light as being composed of waves, since investigations show that light behaves like water waves. Since it is impossible to visually see what is genuinely...
Hierarchy of Motor Control
The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.
Schemas
A schema is a mental construct consisting of a cluster or collection of related concepts (Bartlett, 1932). There are many different types of schemata, and they all have one thing in common: schemata are a method of organizing information that allows the brain to work more efficiently. When a schema is activated, the brain makes immediate assumptions about the person or object being observed.
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts: