Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Overview of Microscopy Techniques01:22

Overview of Microscopy Techniques

The early pioneers of microscopy opened a window into the invisible world of microorganisms. In 1830, Joseph Jackson Lister created an essentially modern light microscope. The 20th century saw the development of microscopes that leveraged nonvisible light, such as fluorescence microscopy that uses an ultraviolet light source and electron microscopy that uses short-wavelength electron beams. These advances significantly improved magnification, image resolution, and contrast. By comparison, the...
Atomic Force Microscopy01:08

Atomic Force Microscopy

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is a type of scanning probe microscopy that can analyze topographic details of various specimens like ceramics, glass, polymers, and biological samples. AFM offers over 1000 times more resolution than the optical imaging system. Images generated from AFM are three-dimensional surface profiles, offering an advantage over the flat, two-dimensional images from other imaging techniques.
The AFM Probe
The probe is regarded as the heart of any AFM setup and comprises the...
Scanning Electron Microscopy01:07

Scanning Electron Microscopy

A scanning electron microscope (SEM) is used to study the surface features of a sample by using an electron beam that scans the sample surface in a two-dimensional manner. Typically, areas between ~1 centimeter to 5 micrometers in width can be imaged. SEM can be used to image bacteria, viruses, tissues as well as larger samples like insects. Conventional SEM gives a magnification ranging from 20X to 30,000X and spatial resolution of 50 to 100 nanometers.
Fundamental Principles
Accelerated...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Core-shell ZIF-8@Au labels for high-sensitivity lateral flow assays via thiol-functionalization and seed-mediated growth.

Mikrochimica acta·2025
Same author

Fully On-Smartphone: Efficient Speed-Up of Sperm Tracking Algorithm for Point-of-Care Semen Analysis.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·2025
Same author

A Stained-Free Sperm Morphology Measurement Method Based on Multi-Target Instance Parsing and Measurement Accuracy Enhancement.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

CP-Net: Instance-aware part segmentation network for biological cell parsing.

Medical image analysis·2024
Same author

Correction: A spiral microfluidic device for rapid sorting, trapping, and long-term live imaging of <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i> embryos.

Microsystems & nanoengineering·2023
Same author

Modeling and Compensation of Positioning Error in Micromanipulation.

Micromachines·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2026

Tracking Electrochemistry on Single Nanoparticles with Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Spectroscopy and Microscopy
10:59

Tracking Electrochemistry on Single Nanoparticles with Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Spectroscopy and Microscopy

Published on: May 12, 2023

Contact detection for nanomanipulation in a scanning electron microscope.

Changhai Ru1, Steve To

  • 1Automation College, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China. rchhai@gmail.com

Ultramicroscopy
|June 26, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel image-based method for detecting end-effector contact during scanning electron microscope (SEM) nanomanipulation. This technique enhances 3D manipulation accuracy without fragile sensors.

More Related Videos

Optimizing Magnetic Force Microscopy Resolution and Sensitivity to Visualize Nanoscale Magnetic Domains
07:42

Optimizing Magnetic Force Microscopy Resolution and Sensitivity to Visualize Nanoscale Magnetic Domains

Published on: July 20, 2022

Probing Surface Electrochemical Activity of Nanomaterials using a Hybrid Atomic Force Microscope-Scanning Electrochemical Microscope (AFM-SECM)
08:31

Probing Surface Electrochemical Activity of Nanomaterials using a Hybrid Atomic Force Microscope-Scanning Electrochemical Microscope (AFM-SECM)

Published on: February 10, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2026

Tracking Electrochemistry on Single Nanoparticles with Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Spectroscopy and Microscopy
10:59

Tracking Electrochemistry on Single Nanoparticles with Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Spectroscopy and Microscopy

Published on: May 12, 2023

Optimizing Magnetic Force Microscopy Resolution and Sensitivity to Visualize Nanoscale Magnetic Domains
07:42

Optimizing Magnetic Force Microscopy Resolution and Sensitivity to Visualize Nanoscale Magnetic Domains

Published on: July 20, 2022

Probing Surface Electrochemical Activity of Nanomaterials using a Hybrid Atomic Force Microscope-Scanning Electrochemical Microscope (AFM-SECM)
08:31

Probing Surface Electrochemical Activity of Nanomaterials using a Hybrid Atomic Force Microscope-Scanning Electrochemical Microscope (AFM-SECM)

Published on: February 10, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Nanotechnology
  • Microscopy
  • Robotics

Background:

  • Accurate XYZ positioning is crucial for nanomanipulation systems.
  • Scanning electron microscopes (SEM) offer high-resolution XY imaging but lack Z-depth information.
  • Current contact detection methods for SEM nanomanipulation often rely on fragile sensors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a contact detection method for nanomanipulation inside SEM using only image processing.
  • To overcome the limitations of Z-depth information in SEM for 3D nanomanipulation.
  • To provide a robust and easily integrable contact detection solution.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a depth-from-focus technique for the initial approach of the end-effector.
  • Implemented fine contact detection based on SEM image analysis.
  • Focused on processing SEM images for contact determination.

Main Results:

  • Achieved an accuracy of 21.5 nm at 50,000× magnification.
  • Demonstrated successful contact detection purely from SEM image processing.
  • Showed minimal end-effector damage during the process.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed image-based method enables precise contact detection in SEM nanomanipulation.
  • This approach improves the efficiency and reliability of 3D nanomanipulation.
  • The technique offers a viable alternative to fragile touch sensors.