Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Sample Size Calculation01:19

Sample Size Calculation

Knowledge of the sample size is the first requirement to conduct random sampling or an experiment. The sample size is the total number of units, observations, or groups (in some cases) used to get the data to estimate a population parameter. As the name suggests, the sample size is that of the sample drawn from the population and differs from the population size.
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Pick fold in tau filaments from human MAPT mutants.

Acta neuropathologica·2026
Same author

Evaluating the effectiveness of simvastatin in slowing the progression of disability in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a synopsis of MS-STAT2, a multicentre, randomised controlled, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2026
Same author

Pathology and Genetics in a Global Cohort of Parkinsonian Disorders.

JAMA neurology·2026
Same author

Concerns regarding the 2024 revisions of the McDonald criteria for diagnosis of multiple sclerosis - Authors' reply.

The Lancet. Neurology·2026
Same author

Anti-Nogo-A NG101 treatment induces changes in spinal cord micro- and macrostructure following spinal cord injury.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Kayser-Fleischer rings detected incidentally after ocular trauma leading to the diagnosis of Wilson's disease.

Practical neurology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2026

The Optical Fractionator Technique to Estimate Cell Numbers in a Rat Model of Electroconvulsive Therapy
07:55

The Optical Fractionator Technique to Estimate Cell Numbers in a Rat Model of Electroconvulsive Therapy

Published on: July 9, 2017

What sample sizes for reliability and validity studies in neurology?

Jeremy C Hobart1, Stefan J Cano, Thomas T Warner

  • 1Clinical Neurology Research Group, Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry, Tamar Science Park, Room N13 ITTC Building, Davy Road, Plymouth, UK. jeremy.hobart@pcmd.ac.uk

Journal of Neurology
|June 26, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Sample size impacts reliability and validity estimates in neurologic research. Minimum sample sizes of 20 for reliability and 80 for validity ensure representative findings for rating scales.

More Related Videos

Performing Permanent Distal Middle Cerebral with Common Carotid Artery Occlusion in Aged Rats to Study Cortical Ischemia with Sustained Disability
09:11

Performing Permanent Distal Middle Cerebral with Common Carotid Artery Occlusion in Aged Rats to Study Cortical Ischemia with Sustained Disability

Published on: February 23, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2026

The Optical Fractionator Technique to Estimate Cell Numbers in a Rat Model of Electroconvulsive Therapy
07:55

The Optical Fractionator Technique to Estimate Cell Numbers in a Rat Model of Electroconvulsive Therapy

Published on: July 9, 2017

Performing Permanent Distal Middle Cerebral with Common Carotid Artery Occlusion in Aged Rats to Study Cortical Ischemia with Sustained Disability
09:11

Performing Permanent Distal Middle Cerebral with Common Carotid Artery Occlusion in Aged Rats to Study Cortical Ischemia with Sustained Disability

Published on: February 23, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Psychometrics
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Rating scales are crucial tools in neurologic research and clinical trials.
  • Determining appropriate sample sizes for reliability and validity is essential for robust findings across diverse neurologic conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of sample size on the stability of reliability and validity estimates for neurologic rating scales.
  • To assess how varying sample sizes affect inferences drawn from reliability and validity testing.

Main Methods:

  • Two studies were conducted: Study 1 involved retrospective sample size reduction (n=713-20), and Study 2 used prospective sample generation (n=20-320).
  • Reliability (internal consistency, item-total correlations, test-retest) and validity (construct, convergent, discriminant) were estimated across all sample sizes.

Main Results:

  • Reliability estimates remained stable across all tested sample sizes.
  • Validity estimates showed stability in samples of n ≥ 80, with 75% stability at n=40 and 50% at n=20.
  • Minimum sample sizes of 20 for reliability and 80 for validity yielded estimates representative of the full study samples.

Conclusions:

  • Reliability estimates are stable even with smaller sample sizes (n=20).
  • Validity estimates require larger sample sizes (n=80) for stability and representativeness.
  • These findings provide provisional guidance for sample size selection in neurologic rating scale validation studies.