Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Extending the c-statistic to nominal polytomous outcomes: the Polytomous Discrimination Index
Ben Van Calster1, Vanya Van Belle, Yvonne Vergouwe
1Department of Reproduction, Development, and Regeneration, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. ben.vancalster@med.kuleuven.be
Abstract:
Diagnostic problems in medicine are sometimes polytomous, meaning that the outcome has more than two distinct categories. For example, ovarian tumors can be benign, borderline, primary invasive, or metastatic. Extending the main measure of binary discrimination, the c-statistic or area under the ROC curve, to nominal polytomous settings is not straightforward. This paper reviews existing measures and presents the polytomous discrimination index (PDI) as an alternative. The PDI assesses all sets of k cases consisting of one case from each outcome category. For each category i (i = 1, … ,k), it is assessed whether the risk of category i is highest for the case from category i. A score of 1∕k is given per category for which this holds, yielding a set score between 0 and 1 to indicate the level of discrimination. The PDI is the average set score and is interpreted as the probability to correctly identify a case from a randomly selected category within a set of k cases. This probability can be split up by outcome category, yielding k category-specific values that result in the PDI when averaged. We demonstrate the measures on two diagnostic problems (residual mass histology after chemotherapy for testicular cancer; diagnosis of ovarian tumors). We compare the behavior of the measures on theoretical data, showing that PDI is more strongly influenced by simultaneous discrimination between all categories than by partial discrimination between pairs of categories. In conclusion, the PDI is attractive because it better matches the requirements of a measure to summarize polytomous discrimination.
Related Concept Videos
Sign Test for Nominal Data
For example, consider a...
Test for Homogeneity
Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...
Polymers: Molecular Weight Distribution
Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics
One of...
