Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Echo01:06

Echo

The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case, then the...
Sound Intensity Level00:53

Sound Intensity Level

Humans perceive sound by hearing. The human ear helps sound waves reach the brain, which then interprets the waves and creates the perception of hearing. The loudness of the environment in which a person is located determines whether they can distinguish between different sound sources.
The human ear can perceive an extensive range of sound intensity, necessitating the use of the logarithmic scale to define a physical quantity—the intensity level. It is a ratio of two intensities and hence a...
Perception of Sound Waves01:01

Perception of Sound Waves

The human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies in the audible range. It may perceive sound waves with the same pressure but different frequencies as having different loudness. Moreover, the perception of sound waves depends on the health of an individual's ears, which decays with age. The health of one's ears may also be affected by regular exposure to loud noises.
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same frequency...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association between physical function and type 2 diabetes risk in older adults: a longitudinal analysis from the KoGES-Anseong cohort.

European geriatric medicine·2026
Same author

Multimodal physiological correlates of surgeon stress in live robot-assisted surgery.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same author

Quantification of Ulnar Nerve Elastic Modulus Using Shear Wave Elastography: A Study of Sex Differences in Healthy Adults.

The journal of hand surgery Asian-Pacific volume·2026
Same author

Impact and prevention of sedentary behavior on musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace: a meta-analysis and LDA topic model.

BMC musculoskeletal disorders·2026
Same author

Association of Physical Activity With All-Cause and CVD Mortality Across Metabolic and Obesity Phenotypes.

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism·2026
Same authorSame journal

Longitudinal analysis of neuromuscular adaptation using entropy and PCA during motor learning.

Journal of physiological anthropology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2026

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners
07:52

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Published on: March 13, 2026

Physiological responses at short distances from a parametric speaker.

Soomin Lee1, Yoshihiro Shimomura, Tetsuo Katsuura

  • 1Center for Environment, Health and Field Sciences, Chiba University, Kashiwa, Japan.

Journal of Physiological Anthropology
|June 29, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Parametric speakers did not show reduced physiological burden at close distances (1m or less). Unlike previous findings at 2.6m, this study found no significant difference between parametric and general speakers near the body.

More Related Videos

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
07:14

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
14:05

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2026

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners
07:52

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Published on: March 13, 2026

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
07:14

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
14:05

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Acoustics and Psychoacoustics
  • Human Physiology
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Parametric speakers offer directional sound, with previous research indicating lower physiological burden at 2.6m compared to general speakers.
  • The impact of parametric speakers at closer distances (≤1m) on human physiology and cognitive performance remains uninvestigated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the physiological effects and task performance of parametric speakers at close proximity to human subjects.
  • To compare the physiological burden of parametric speakers versus general speakers at distances of 0.3m and 1.0m.

Main Methods:

  • Nine male subjects underwent three sessions: baseline, a 30-minute mental task with either general or parametric speakers, and recovery.
  • Physiological measures included electrocardiogram (ECG), photoplethysmogram (PTG), electroencephalogram (EEG), and blood pressure.
  • A three-way repeated measures ANOVA analyzed speaker type, distance (0.3m, 1.0m), and time factors.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences in physiological responses were observed between parametric and general speakers at close distances.
  • Physiological burden increased over time, irrespective of speaker type or distance.
  • The previously observed benefits of parametric speakers at 2.6m were not replicated at 1.0m or less.

Conclusions:

  • Parametric speakers do not offer a reduced physiological burden compared to general speakers at close distances (≤1m).
  • Temporal factors, rather than speaker type or proximity, significantly influenced physiological burden during the task.
  • The findings suggest that the advantages of parametric speakers are distance-dependent and may not extend to near-field applications.