Outcome of patients presenting with ST elevation myocardial infarct and cardiogenic shock: a contemporary single center's experience
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Gabriel Greenberg1, Abid Assali, Hanna Assa-Vaknin
1Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach-Tikva, affiliated with the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Insights
Despite advances in treatment, ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with cardiogenic shock (CS) still has a poor prognosis. Identifying risk factors like diabetes and reduced ejection fraction is crucial for improving outcomes in these high-mortality patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Background:
- Acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) carries a high mortality rate.
- Recent years have seen advancements in reperfusion therapies and pharmacological treatments for STEMI and CS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of patients with STEMI and CS over the past decade.
- To identify key prognostic factors influencing mortality in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 170 patients with STEMI and CS undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 2001 and 2011 was analyzed.
- Patients were divided into two groups: 2001-2005 (n=70) and 2006-2011 (n=100).
- Clinical outcomes were assessed up to 6 months post-intervention.
Main Results:
- The later treatment period (2006-2011) included younger patients with less renal failure and more stent use, but mortality remained high (52-59% at 6 months).
- Key predictors of 1-month mortality included diabetes, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 ml/min/m², and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use.
- The combination of diabetes and renal failure was associated with particularly high mortality.
Conclusions:
- The prognosis for patients with STEMI and CS treated with primary PCI over the last decade remains poor.
- Improved risk stratification strategies are needed to enhance outcomes for these critically ill patients.
Objectives:
Acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with dismal prognosis. In the last years, significant advances have been made in reperfusion techniques and pharmacological treatment. Therefore, we aimed to assess the outcome of these patients during the past decade and identify major factors that impact their prognosis.
Methods:
We identified 170 patients who presented with STEMI, CS, and underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 2001 and 2011. Patients were allocated into two groups based on period of presentation: 2001-2005 (n = 70) and 2006-2011 (n = 100). Clinical outcomes up to 6 months were evaluated.
Results:
Patients in the latter period were younger, and had lower rates of renal failure and higher rates of stent use. Despite these differences, mortality did not differ and remained high in both periods (52-59% at 6 months). Time frames from onset of symptoms to arrival to the emergency department and to performance of coronary intervention were similar in both periods. Intra-aortic balloon pump use was similar in both periods. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with 1-month mortality were: diabetes (OR = 3.6, 1.4-9.4, p = 0.007), LVEF <40% (OR = 1.8, 1.3-2.6, p = 0.001), GFR <60 ml/min/m(2) (OR = 1.8, 1.3-2.4, p < 0.009) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use (OR = 0.5, 0.2-1.1, p = 0.08). The combination of diabetes and renal failure was associated with particularly high mortality.
Conclusions:
Prognosis of patients presenting with STEMI, CS, and treated with primary PCI during the past decade, remains poor. Better risk-stratification may help improve their grave outcome.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies
