Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Application of Nonlinear Inequalities01:29

Application of Nonlinear Inequalities

A nonlinear inequality describes a comparison involving an expression that curves or behaves more complexly than a straight line. These inequalities often appear in forms that include squares, products, or variables in the denominator.To solve such an inequality, one starts by rewriting it so that zero appears on one side. For example, the inequality:  can be factored as: This form makes it easier to identify the values that cause the expression to equal zero. In this case, the key values are 3...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Introduction to Nonlinear Inequalities01:25

Introduction to Nonlinear Inequalities

Linear and nonlinear inequalities are fundamental for analyzing variable relationships and identifying ranges satisfying specific conditions. A linear inequality involves variables raised only to the first power, resulting in a straight-line graph. This line partitions the coordinate plane into two distinct regions: one that satisfies the inequality and one that does not. Each region represents a set of solutions where the linear relationship holds true under the specified constraint.Nonlinear...
False Memories01:18

False Memories

False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Understanding Deception01:14

Understanding Deception

Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
Classification of Systems-I01:26

Classification of Systems-I

Linearity is a system property characterized by a direct input-output relationship, combining homogeneity and additivity.
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Letter Commenting on NCRP.

Health physics·2019
Same author

Requirements for Transparency and Communicability of Regulatory Science.

Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society·2018
Same author

Regulating Ionizing Radiation Based on Metrics for Evaluation of Regulatory Science Claims.

Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society·2018
Same author

Regulatory science requirements of labeling of genetically modified food.

Critical reviews in biotechnology·2017
Same author

Golden rice: scientific, regulatory and public information processes of a genetically modified organism.

Critical reviews in biotechnology·2015
Same author

Scientific foundation of regulating ionizing radiation: application of metrics for evaluation of regulatory science information.

Health physics·2014
Same journal

Retraction: Flucytosine and Amphotericin B Coadministration Induces Dose-Related Renal Injury.

Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society·2026
Same journal

miRNA-Targeted Herbal Compounds Against Gastric Precancerous Evolution in Chronic Atrophic Gastritis.

Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society·2026
Same journal

Plant-Mediated Fabrication of Iron and Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles for Anticancer Efficacy Against HT-29 and HepG2 Cells.

Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society·2026
Same journal

Total <i>Sanghuangporus vaninii</i> Extract Ameliorates Cisplatin-Induced Glioma Cell Death by Regulating Ferroptosis and Inflammation.

Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society·2026
Same journal

Causal Association Between Gut Microbiota, Plasma Metabolites, and Prostate Cancer: Two-Step Mendelian Randomization Study.

Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society·2026
Same journal

DMSO Protects Against Radiation-Induced Ovarian Injury by Preserving Mitochondrial Function and Alleviating DNA Damage.

Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2026

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

Linear non-threshold: separating facts from fiction.

A Alan Moghissi1, Betty R Love, Sorin R Straja

  • 1Institute for Regulatory Science.

Dose-Response : a Publication of International Hormesis Society
|June 29, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Linear Non-Threshold (LNT) model, used by agencies to assess cancer risk from carcinogens, faces scrutiny. This study evaluates the LNT hypothesis

Keywords:
Best Available ScienceLinear Non-ThresholdMetrics for Evaluation of Scientific Claims

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2026

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Health
  • Toxicology
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • The Linear Non-Threshold (LNT) model is widely adopted by regulatory agencies for estimating cancer incidence.
  • This model is fundamental in assessing risks associated with carcinogen exposure.
  • Concerns exist regarding the scientific reliability and uncertainties inherent in the LNT hypothesis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the reliability of the Linear Non-Threshold (LNT) hypothesis.
  • To apply the Best Available Science (BAS) framework and Metrics for Evaluation of Scientific Claims (MESC) to the LNT model.
  • To identify the scientific maturity and uncertainties associated with the LNT hypothesis.

Main Methods:

  • Application of Best Available Science (BAS) principles.
  • Utilizing Metrics for Evaluation of Scientific Claims (MESC) for scientific assessment.
  • Analysis of existing data and literature concerning the LNT hypothesis.

Main Results:

  • The LNT hypothesis exhibits limitations in its current scientific maturity.
  • Significant uncertainties are associated with the LNT model's predictions.
  • The BAS-MESC framework highlights areas needing further scientific validation for LNT.

Conclusions:

  • The reliability of the LNT hypothesis requires further rigorous scientific investigation.
  • Current uncertainties necessitate a cautious approach to LNT-based risk assessments.
  • The BAS-MESC methodology provides a robust framework for evaluating scientific claims like LNT.