Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
Published on: June 28, 2019
Factors associated with noninvasive coronary flow reserve in severe aortic stenosis
Patrick Meimoun1, Anne Laure Germain, Frederic Elmkies
1Department of Cardiology, Compiègne Hospital, Compiègne, France. patrickmeimoun.md@gmail.com
Insights
Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is reduced in severe aortic stenosis (AS) and is linked to N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), left ventricular (LV) workload, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP). Symptomatic AS patients exhibit more impaired CFR and higher NT-proBNP levels.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Echocardiography
Background:
- Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is impaired with increasing aortic stenosis (AS) severity.
- Significant variability exists in CFR among patients with severe AS, with poorly understood contributing factors.
- This study investigates the correlates of noninvasive CFR in severe AS patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEFs).
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify factors associated with noninvasive CFR in severe AS patients.
- To explore the relationship between CFR and clinical parameters, including NT-proBNP, LV workload, and PASP.
- To compare CFR in symptomatic versus asymptomatic severe AS.
Main Methods:
- Sixty-six patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF underwent Doppler echocardiography with CFR measurement via adenosine infusion.
- CFR was calculated as hyperemic peak left anterior descending (LAD) flow velocity divided by baseline flow velocity.
- Plasma NT-proBNP levels were assessed, and patients were stratified by symptom status.
Main Results:
- Patients with AS had lower CFR compared to controls.
- CFR showed inverse correlations with age, E/e', indexed LV mass, NT-proBNP, PASP, LV rate-pressure product, and indexed left atrial volume.
- Symptomatic AS patients had more impaired CFR and higher NT-proBNP levels than asymptomatic patients.
Conclusions:
- In severe AS with preserved LVEF, CFR varies widely and is primarily associated with NT-proBNP, LV rate-pressure product, and PASP.
- NT-proBNP serves as a surrogate for increased LV wall stress.
- CFR is more compromised in symptomatic severe AS patients.
Background:
Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is progressively impaired with aortic stenosis (AS) severity. However, there is a broad range of CFR in patients with severe AS, and the factors responsible for this variability are weakly characterized. The aim of this study was to assess the correlates of noninvasive CFR in patients with severe AS (≤1 cm(2) or ≤0.6 cm(2)/m(2)) and preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fractions (LVEFs) (>50%).
Methods:
Sixty-six consecutive patients (mean age, 74 ± 11 years; 31 women; mean LVEF, 69 ± 10%) with isolated severe AS (mean, 0.75 ± 0.2 cm(2) and 0.42 ± 0.1 cm(2)/m(2)), without coronary artery disease, underwent prospectively Doppler transthoracic echocardiography including CFR measurement in the distal part of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) with intravenous adenosine infusion (140 μg/kg/min over 2 min). CFR was defined as hyperemic peak LAD flow velocity divided by baseline flow velocity. Twenty controls matched for age and gender served as a comparative group. Plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was also assessed.
Results:
Compared with controls, patients with AS had higher baseline LAD flow velocities (36 ± 11 vs 27 ± 6 cm/sec, P < 0.01), lower hyperemic LAD flow velocities (80 ± 20 vs 89 ± 18 cm/sec, P = .09), and consequently lower CFR (2.3 ± 0.7 vs 3.3 ± 0.7, P < .01). In patients with AS, there were significant inverse correlations between CFR and age, E/e', indexed LV mass, NT-proBNP, pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), baseline LV rate-pressure product, heart rate, and indexed left atrial volume and a significant positive correlation between CFR and LVEF (all P values < .05). Furthermore, compared with patients with asymptomatic AS (n = 22), those with symptomatic AS had more severely impaired CFR (2.15 ± 0.6 vs 2.7 ± 0.65), and higher NT-proBNP values (all P values < .05). In multivariate analysis, NT-proBNP, PASP, and LV rate-pressure product were the main independent correlates of CFR (all P values ≤ .01), and PASP was independently predicted by E/e' and indexed left atrial volume (all P values < .01).
Conclusions:
In patients with severe AS and preserved LVEFs, there is a relatively broad range of CFR values. CFR is more severely impaired in patients with symptomatic AS and is mainly linked with NT-proBNP, a surrogate of increased LV wall stress, workload as measured by LV rate-pressure product, and PASP.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management

