Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026
Deep Neuromuscular Blockade Leads to a Larger Intraabdominal Volume During Laparoscopy
Published on: June 25, 2013
[Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy: comparison with abdominal myomectomy]
N Ranisavljevic1, G Mercier, F Masia
1Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Caremeau, CHU de Nîmes, place du Professeur-R.-Debré, Nîmes cedex 9, France. noemie_rani@yahoo.fr
Objective:
To compare morbidity of robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus those performed by laparotomy.
Patients And Methods:
It reports a monocentric retrospective case matched analysis enrolling 22 patients (six laparotomic and 16 robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomies), needing a surgical treatment for at least one myoma oversizing 6cm.
Results:
Both patient groups were comparable regarding their age, their weight and myoma's size. There were more complications in the laparotomy group in comparison with the robotic group (66.7%, versus 0%; P=0.002). Average intraoperative blood losses were respectively 397±377mL versus 387±349mL (P=0.71) and length of stay 7.2±0.8 days versus 3.9±2.8 days (P<0.001). None of the robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy needed any conversion to laparotomy.
Conclusion:
Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy seems to be feasible for heavy fibroids, with a lower morbidity in comparison with laparotomy. These results must be confirmed by several wider prospective studies.
