Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026
05:15
Application of a New Mesh Fixation Method in Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair
Published on: December 23, 2022
PerFix™ plug versus 4DDOME(®) implants for inguinal hernia repair: prospective multicentric randomised controlled
D Mutter1, G Champault, D Binot
1Department of Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 place de l'Hôpital, 67091 Strasbourg, France.
Summary
This study compared the PerFix™ plug and 4DDOME® mesh for hernia repair. While short-term outcomes were similar, the 4DDOME® mesh showed reduced pain and discomfort at 3 and 6 months post-surgery.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Innovation
- Medical Device Technology
- Hernia Repair
Background:
- Anterior mesh placement is standard for hernia repair.
- Partially absorbable meshes may reduce post-operative pain without compromising repair durability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and patient outcomes of the PerFix™ plug versus the 4DDOME® partially absorbable mesh in hernia repair.
Main Methods:
- Prospective randomized study involving 95 patients undergoing hernia repair.
- Comparison of PerFix™ plug and 4DDOME® implant.
- Evaluation of operative details, post-operative pain (VAS), hospital stay, return to activity, and quality of life (SF36).
Main Results:
- No significant differences in clinical characteristics, hernia type, or intra-operative course between the two groups.
- Similar post-operative pain, hospital stay, and return to activity between PerFix™ plug and 4DDOME® groups.
- 4DDOME® group showed significantly lower pain at 3 months (p=0.021) and improved health criteria at 6 months (p=0.028).
Conclusions:
- Both meshes demonstrated similar short-term hernia repair outcomes.
- The 4DDOME® mesh was associated with reduced post-operative pain and discomfort at 3 and 6 months.
- The 4DDOME® design may offer an advance in anterior tension-free hernia repair by balancing early strength with long-term material properties.