Adjusted significance cutoffs for hypothesis tests applied with generalized additive models with bivariate smoothers
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
Robin L Bliss1, Janice Weinberg, Verónica M Vieira
1Department of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St., Boston, MA 02118, USA. ryoung@bu.edu
Abstract:
In spatial epidemiology, generalized additive models (GAMs) can be applied with bivariate locally weighted regression smoothing terms (LOESS), smoothing over longitude and latitude, to evaluate whether there is spatial variation in disease risk across a study region. Two hypothesis testing methods applicable with GAMs with bivariate LOESS smoothes, an approximate chi-square test (ACST) and the conditional permutation test (CPT), have inflated type I error rates. Using simulated data we determined empirical adjustments to significance cutoffs for nominal type I error rates of 0.01, 0.05, and 0.10. When applied with adjusted significance cutoffs, both ACST and CPT were appropriately sized across region shapes, population densities, sample sizes, and probabilities of disease.
Related Concept Videos
Significance Testing: Overview
Bonferroni Test
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes
Goodness-of-Fit Test
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
