Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II01:26

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II

Effective documentation is an integral part of nursing practice. Here are some essential guidelines to follow when documenting patient care:
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I01:30

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I

Quality documentation and reporting share essential characteristics that ensure they are practical and valuable resources for those who use them. These characteristics are:
Factual:  
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Patient-centered Care01:13

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II01:25

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II

Nursing diagnoses represent a problem validated by major defining characteristics. There are four categories of nursing diagnoses: problem-focused, risk, health promotion or wellness, and syndrome. The anatomy of a nursing diagnosis includes three components: problem statement or diagnostic label, defining characteristics, and related factors.
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
Critical Thinking I01:24

Critical Thinking I

Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career with...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of a training program on gastroenterology health care professionals' patient-centered shared decision-making: a pilot study.

BMC gastroenterology·2026
Same author

Time to Refresh: Design and Evaluation of Refresher Training to Sustain Procedural Teaching Skills.

Perspectives on medical education·2026
Same author

Enhanced Trainer Performance and Resident Learning Following Implementation of a Training the Colonoscopy Trainers Course.

Gastroenterology·2025
Same author

Barriers to Implementing Shared Decision-Making in Postgraduate Medical Education: The Role of Disease-Centered Beliefs.

Perspectives on medical education·2025
Same author

Shared decision making and inhaled medication adherence in patients with COPD, asthma and cystic fibrosis: a systematic review.

Respiratory medicine·2025
Same author

Completing Death Certificates in Hospital Setting: What Can Go Wrong, Will Go Wrong.

Academic forensic pathology·2025
Same journal

[Insulin intoxications caused by falsified semaglutide].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2026
Same journal

[Professional skepticism in medical research].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2026
Same journal

[Improving mobility in painful osteoarthritis].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2026
Same journal

[The effectiveness and costs of the Back At work After Surgery (BAAS) work-integrated care pathway on return to work for patients receiving knee arthroplasty].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2026
Same journal

[The rise of genetic therapies: urgent moral and societal questions].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2026
Same journal

[A man with a wound on his elbow].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

[Interpretation and judgment formation influence evidence based guidelines].

Paul L P Brand1

  • 1Isala klinieken, Amalia kinderafdeling, Zwolle, the Netherlands. p.l.p.brand@isala.nl

Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde
|July 4, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Expert opinions influence evidence-based guidelines. Explicitly stating these views, as recommended by the GRADE methodology, enhances physician adherence to guidelines.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Guideline development

Context:

  • Interpreting epidemiological evidence is crucial for evidence-based guidelines.
  • Human dynamic judgment formation suggests personal expert views impact guideline interpretation.
  • The GRADE methodology recommends explicit statement of expert views.

Purpose:

  • To explore the role of expert judgment in interpreting epidemiological evidence for guidelines.
  • To investigate how explicit declaration of expert views affects guideline implementation.

Summary:

  • Expert opinions and personal convictions are integral to interpreting epidemiological evidence during guideline development.
  • Explicitly stating these subjective elements, following the GRADE approach, is associated with increased physician compliance with guidelines.

Impact:

  • Enhancing transparency in guideline development can improve physician trust and adherence.
  • Clearer guidelines, acknowledging expert input, may lead to more effective clinical practice.