Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

Multiplex Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Isotope-dilution HPLC-MS/MS of Antibiotics in Critical Illnesses
Published on: August 30, 2018
Effect of a pharmacist intervention on clinically important medication errors after hospital discharge: a randomized
Sunil Kripalani1, Christianne L Roumie, Anuj K Dalal
1Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, 1215 21st Avenue South, Suite 6000 Medical Center East, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. sunil.kripalani@vanderbilt.edu
Background:
Clinically important medication errors are common after hospital discharge. They include preventable or ameliorable adverse drug events (ADEs), as well as medication discrepancies or nonadherence with high potential for future harm (potential ADEs).
Objective:
To determine the effect of a tailored intervention on the occurrence of clinically important medication errors after hospital discharge.
Design:
Randomized, controlled trial with concealed allocation and blinded outcome assessors. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00632021)
Setting:
Two tertiary care academic hospitals.
Patients:
Adults hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes or acute decompensated heart failure.
Intervention:
Pharmacist-assisted medication reconciliation, inpatient pharmacist counseling, low-literacy adherence aids, and individualized telephone follow-up after discharge.
Measurements:
The primary outcome was the number of clinically important medication errors per patient during the first 30 days after hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included preventable or ameliorable ADEs, as well as potential ADEs.
Results:
Among 851 participants, 432 (50.8%) had 1 or more clinically important medication errors; 22.9% of such errors were judged to be serious and 1.8% life-threatening. Adverse drug events occurred in 258 patients (30.3%) and potential ADEs in 253 patients (29.7%). The intervention did not significantly alter the per-patient number of clinically important medication errors (unadjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.10]) or ADEs (unadjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.09 [CI, 0.86 to 1.39]). Patients in the intervention group tended to have fewer potential ADEs (unadjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.80 [CI, 0.61 to 1.04]).
Limitation:
The characteristics of the study hospitals and participants may limit generalizability.
Conclusion:
Clinically important medication errors were present among one half of patients after hospital discharge and were not significantly reduced by a health-literacy-sensitive, pharmacist-delivered intervention.
Primary Funding Source:
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Excretion