Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Robbers Cave

Robbers Cave

During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...

Nonconscious Mimicry

Nonconscious Mimicry

Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.

In- and Out-Groups

In- and Out-Groups

People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...

Motivational Bias

Motivational Bias

Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

EVApeCognition: An 18-Year Dataset of Great Ape Cognition.

Scientific data·2026

Same author

Animal cumulative culture through changing environments.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026

Same author

The German version of the highly sensitive child scale: Psychometric properties and identification of sensitivity groups.

Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)·2026

Same author

Local specialists' experience and skills in animal behaviour studies: insights from wild chimpanzee field assistants.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026

Same author

Behavioural manifestations of human-directed social motivation in dogs.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

Chimpanzees rationally revise their beliefs.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Great apes infer others' goals based on context.

David Buttelmann¹, Sebastian Schütte, Malinda Carpenter

¹Research Group "Kleinkindforschung in Thueringen", University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany. david.buttelmann@uni-erfurt.de

Animal Cognition

|July 4, 2012

Summary

Great apes can understand human goals without needing immediate behavioral cues. Studies show they infer intentions from past actions and contextual changes, demonstrating advanced cognitive abilities in great ape research.

More Related Videos

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device (ALDM) Test Systems

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device (ALDM) Test Systems

Published on: May 5, 2015

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device (ALDM) Test Systems

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device (ALDM) Test Systems

Published on: May 5, 2015

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

Area of Science:

Cognitive ethology
Primate behavior
Comparative psychology

Background:

Previous studies on great ape goal understanding relied on potentially confounding behavioral cues.
A gap exists in understanding if apes can infer goals without concurrent social signals.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate whether great apes can infer human goals without relying on subtle, concurrent behavioral cues.
To determine if apes use contextual information and past experiences to understand others' intentions.

Main Methods:

Controlled experiments where experimenter behavior was identical in test and control phases, differing only in preceding context.
Study 1: Assessed ape interpretation of ambiguous actions based on prior human actions with similar objects.
Study 2: Observed chimpanzee reactions to a human's goal-directed actions (retrieving food) and how novel events altered their expectations.

Main Results:

Great apes successfully inferred the goal of opening a box based on the human's prior actions, even without concurrent cues.
Chimpanzees adjusted their expectations about a human's goal (retrieving food) when a novel event interrupted the established context.
Apes demonstrated the ability to infer goals from context and past actions, even when cues were temporally displaced.

Conclusions:

Great apes possess the cognitive capacity to infer others' goals without requiring simultaneous behavioral signals.
Goal inference in great apes can be based on a variety of cues, including historical context and learned associations.
These findings advance our understanding of primate cognition and social intelligence, highlighting sophisticated inferential abilities.