Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy01:26

Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy

Phase-Contrast Microscopes
In-phase-contrast microscopes, interference between light directly passing through a cell and light refracted by cellular components is used to create high-contrast, high-resolution images without staining. It is the oldest and simplest type of microscope that creates an image by altering the wavelengths of light rays passing through the specimen. Altered wavelength paths are created using an annular stop in the condenser. The annular stop produces a hollow cone of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics of clomipramine, yohimbine and clomipramine/yohimbine combination: A clinical drug-drug interaction study.

British journal of clinical pharmacology·2024
Same author

One hundred years of EEG for brain and behaviour research.

Nature human behaviour·2024
Same author

Disentangling five dimensions of animacy in human brain and behaviour.

Communications biology·2022
Same author

Kinematics and observer-animator kinematic similarity predict mental state attribution from Heider-Simmel style animations.

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

Diverse Deep Neural Networks All Predict Human Inferior Temporal Cortex Well, After Training and Fitting.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2021
Same author

Correction: Inferring exemplar discriminability in brain representations.

PloS one·2021
Same journal

Learning under constraints: a theoretical framework for comparing resource-constrained learning in biological and artificial systems.

Frontiers in computational neuroscience·2026
Same journal

MsGCN: a multi-stream graph convolutional network for multiband PLV graph fusion in EEG-based biometric identification.

Frontiers in computational neuroscience·2026
Same journal

AI-driven neuroanalytic modeling for mental health: multichannel CNN-based autism spectrum disorder detection via facial pattern analysis.

Frontiers in computational neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Modeling multiscale neural dynamics for EEG-based emotion recognition using an attentive wavelet-transformer framework.

Frontiers in computational neuroscience·2026
Same journal

New directions for complex systems in contemporary neuroscience: a morphodynamic and emergent function approach.

Frontiers in computational neuroscience·2026
Same journal

NMDA receptor kinetics drive distinct routes to chaotic firing in pyramidal neurons.

Frontiers in computational neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

An Open-Source Framework for Mass Calculation of Antibody-Based Therapeutic Molecules
04:24

An Open-Source Framework for Mass Calculation of Antibody-Based Therapeutic Molecules

Published on: June 16, 2023

FOSE: a framework for open science evaluation.

Alexander Walther1, Jasper J F van den Bosch

  • 1Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Medical Research Council Cambridge, UK.

Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
|July 4, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study proposes an open framework for post-publication peer review, enhancing scientific evaluation validity and transparency. It leverages social network principles for a decentralized system, improving research integrity.

Keywords:
open evaluationpeer reviewsocial networkingstandard

More Related Videos

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

An Open-Source Framework for Mass Calculation of Antibody-Based Therapeutic Molecules
04:24

An Open-Source Framework for Mass Calculation of Antibody-Based Therapeutic Molecules

Published on: June 16, 2023

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Scientific communication
  • Scholarly publishing
  • Research integrity

Background:

  • Current pre-publication peer review lacks validity and transparency.
  • Existing systems do not adequately support open evaluation of scientific literature.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel framework for open post-publication evaluation of scientific literature.
  • To enhance the validity and transparency of scientific peer review.
  • To complement the existing pre-publication peer review system.

Main Methods:

  • Formulated necessary conditions for open scientific evaluation systems.
  • Developed a basic data standard and communication protocol.
  • Advocated for a provider-independent framework utilizing existing web standards.

Main Results:

  • A framework for open post-publication evaluation is presented.
  • The proposed system is provider-independent, allowing integration across diverse platforms.
  • Technical implementation is feasible using current web technologies.

Conclusions:

  • An open, provider-independent framework can significantly improve scientific evaluation.
  • This approach enhances transparency and validity in scholarly communication.
  • The framework offers a scalable solution for analyzing open evaluation content.