Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

05:54
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
Two versus three narrow-diameter implants with locator attachments supporting mandibular overdentures: a two-year
Ali M El-Sheikh1, Omar F Shihabuddin, Sahar M F Ghoraba
1Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Tanta 31111, Egypt.
International Journal of Dentistry
|July 4, 2012
Summary
For patients with an atrophic mandible, two narrow-diameter bone level implants with Locator attachments are sufficient for supporting an overdenture, showing comparable outcomes to three implants.
Area of Science:
- Dentistry
- Prosthodontics
- Implantology
Background:
- Edentulous mandibles with atrophy present a challenge for denture stability.
- Narrow-diameter implants offer a solution for patients with limited bone height.
- Locator attachments provide reliable prosthetic anchorage for overdentures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the treatment outcomes of two versus three narrow-diameter bone level implants supporting mandibular overdentures.
- To evaluate survival rates, peri-implant tissue health, and maintenance requirements.
- To determine the optimal number of implants for mandibular overdentures in atrophic mandibles.
Main Methods:
- Twenty completely edentulous patients with atrophic mandibles were enrolled.
- Group A received two narrow implants; Group B received three narrow implants with Locator attachments.
- Clinical and radiographic parameters were assessed at baseline and up to 24 months.
Main Results:
- One implant was lost in the three-implant group during healing.
- No significant differences were observed in clinical or radiographic parameters between groups.
- Prosthodontic complications were minimal in both groups.
Conclusions:
- Two narrow-diameter bone level implants with Locator attachments are adequate for supporting mandibular overdentures in atrophic mandibles.
- The number of implants did not significantly impact survival rates or peri-implant tissue health.
- Further long-term studies are recommended to confirm these findings.