Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025
A range of condylar hypoplasia exists in Treacher Collins syndrome
Roberto Travieso1, Christopher C Chang, Jordan S Terner
1Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Purpose:
Temporomandibular joint malformation is a complex deformity in Treacher-Collins syndrome (TCS); however, it is not well characterized. This study aimed to better clarify this pathology by volumetrically assessing the mandibular condyle in patients with TCS compared with normal controls and the relative contribution of the condyle to hemimandibular volume.
Materials And Methods:
A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of pediatric patients with TCS and unaffected controls was performed. The study sample was comprised of Treacher Collins patients. The predictor variable in this study was disease status (TCS diagnosis vs control), and the outcome variable was condylar volume. Demographic information was collected, and 3-dimensional computed tomographic data were analyzed by computerized segmentation (Materialise). Volumes were obtained for TCS condyles and compared with age-matched controls using the Student t test.
Results:
Three-dimensional computed tomographic scans were identified in 10 patients with TCS (20 sides) and 14 control subjects (28 sides). The TCS group included 4 female and 6 male patients (age, 0.3 to 213 mo; average age, 66.5 mo). The control cohort included 7 female and 7 male subjects (average age, 68.8 mo). Evaluation of the mandibular condyle showed that patients with TCS had a significantly smaller condylar volume than control patients (TCS, 178.28 ± 182.74 mm(3); control, 863.55 ± 367.20 mm(3); P < .001). Additional intragroup analysis showed no significant differences between the left and right condylar volumes in the TCS group (P = .267). In addition, the condyle for patients with TCS represented a smaller proportion of hemimandibular volume compared with controls (1.37% vs 4.19%, respectively; P < .001).
Conclusions:
The results of the this study suggest that condylar volumes are significantly smaller in patients with TCS compared with age-matched controls, and the condyle represents a smaller fraction of the total mandibular volume for patients with TCS than in unaffected children. In addition, there is considerable variability of condylar size in patients with TCS. These facts portend treatment decisions because a functional temporomandibular joint is necessary and may need to be reconstructed as a first stage before effective implementation of distraction procedures.
Related Concept Videos
Nondisjunction
Nondisjunction
Trachea
Anatomical Features:
Location: About half of the trachea is situated in the neck, anterior to the esophagus, and extends from the larynx (at the level of the...
Cohesins
Cohesin complexes in Meiotic Division
Meiosis involves two distinct rounds of chromosomal segregation and cell divisions— Meiosis I followed by Meiosis II – producing four daughter cells. Meiosis I includes the separation of homologous...
Cushing Syndrome II: Pathophysiology
Cellular Adaptation IV: Dysplasia and Metaplasia

