Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) Exam: Image Acquisition
Published on: September 22, 2023
Utility of the cardiac component of FAST in blunt trauma
1Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas at Houston Medical School, and Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Insights
Blunt hemopericardium is rare in trauma patients, occurring in only 0.06% of cases. High-acuity indicators like major injury mechanisms, hypotension, or emergent intubation may help guide the selective use of cardiac ultrasound in blunt trauma.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Trauma Surgery
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) is standard, but cardiac sonography's role in blunt trauma lacks evidence.
- Routine cardiac ultrasound in FAST may not be necessary for all blunt trauma patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of hemopericardium in blunt trauma.
- To assess the sensitivity of specific clinical variables for detecting blunt hemopericardium.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of trauma registry and emergency ultrasound databases.
- Analysis of 29,236 blunt trauma patients over 8.5 years.
- Evaluation of major mechanism of injury, hypotension, and emergent intubation as predictors.
Main Results:
- Blunt hemopericardium and cardiac rupture occurred in 0.06% of blunt trauma patients.
- Incidental effusions were more common (0.13%).
- No cases of blunt hemopericardium or rupture occurred without major injury, hypotension, or intubation.
Conclusions:
- Blunt hemopericardium is a rare finding in blunt trauma.
- High-acuity clinical variables can potentially guide selective echocardiography use in blunt trauma assessment.
Background:
Focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) is widely used and endorsed by guidelines, but little evidence exists regarding the utility of the cardiac portion in blunt trauma. The traditional FAST includes the routine performance of cardiac sonography, regardless of risk for hemopericardium.
Study Objectives:
Our goal was to estimate the prevalence of hemopericardium due to blunt trauma and determine the sensitivity of certain variables for the presence of blunt hemopericardium.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective chart review of two institutional databases at a large urban Level I trauma center to determine the prevalence of blunt hemopericardium and cardiac rupture and incidental or insignificant effusions. We evaluated the sensitivity of major mechanism of injury, hypotension, and emergent intubation for blunt hemopericardium and cardiac rupture.
Results:
Eighteen patients had hemopericardium and cardiac rupture (14 and 4, respectively) out of 29,236 blunt trauma patients in the Trauma Registry over an 8.5-year period. The prevalence was 0.06% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.09%). The prevalence of incidental or insignificant effusions was 0.13% (95% CI 0.09-0.18%). One case of blunt hemopericardium was identified in the emergency ultrasound database out of 777 cardiac ultrasounds over a 3-year period. No patient with blunt hemopericardium or cardiac rupture presented without a major mechanism of injury, hypotension, or emergent intubation.
Conclusion:
Blunt hemopericardium is rare. High-acuity variables may help guide the selective use of echocardiography in blunt trauma.
Related Concept Videos
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
