Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

CO2-Lasertonsillotomy Under Local Anesthesia in Adults
Published on: November 6, 2019
Paediatric adenoidectomy: endoscopic coblation technique compared to cold curettage
L Di Rienzo Businco1, A M Angelone, A Mattei
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, "S. Spirito" Hospital, Rome, Italy. ldirienzo@businco.net
Insights
Endoscopic coblator adenoidectomy offers superior pain relief and faster recovery for children compared to cold curettage. This method ensures complete adenoid removal with less bleeding and improved airflow.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Pediatric Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
Background:
- Adenoid hypertrophy is a common condition in children, often leading to significant respiratory and sleep disturbances.
- Current surgical options for adenoidectomy include cold curettage and coblation, each with distinct recovery profiles.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic coblator adenoidectomy versus cold curettage in pediatric patients.
- To evaluate postoperative outcomes including pain, recovery time, and adenoid remnant presence.
Main Methods:
- A randomized study involving 40 pediatric patients (4-16 years) with adenoid hypertrophy.
- Patients were divided into two groups: cold curettage (Group A) and coblator adenoidectomy (Group B).
- Outcomes assessed included pain scores, analgesic use, diet duration, school absence, fever, bleeding, and rhinomanometry post-surgery.
Main Results:
- The coblator group experienced significantly less pain, shorter recovery periods (fewer days with pain, liquid diet, and school absence), and reduced analgesic requirements.
- Cold curettage resulted in higher rates of adenoid persistence, indicated by persistent nasal obstruction on rhinomanometry.
- Intraoperative bleeding was significantly lower in the coblator group.
Conclusions:
- Endoscopic coblator adenoidectomy provides a safer and more effective treatment for pediatric adenoid hypertrophy compared to cold curettage.
- This technique ensures complete adenoid tissue removal, reduces postoperative complications, and improves nasal airflow.
Abstract:
The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic coblator adenoidectomy compared to cold curettage in paediatric patients. Forty homogeneous children (4-16 years of age) with adenoid hypertrophy were divided in 2 groups to receive adenoidectomy using cold curettage (A) or coblator (B). After surgery the following outcomes were evaluated: pain score on first day, days reporting pain, analgesic days, liquid diet days, absent from school days, pain score, days with nausea, days with fever, endoscopic adenoid grade and intraoperative bleeding. Forty days after surgery, basal rhinomanometry and nasal decongestion test were measured. The coblation group reported significantly less pain on the first post-operative day, days reporting pain, analgesic days, liquid diet days and absent school days. Patients in group A showed a higher grade of adenoid persistence by rhinoendoscopy, with high values of nasal resistances at the rhinomanometry even after nasal decongestion, consistent with greater adenoid persistence after cold curettage causing air flow obstruction even after turbinate decongestion. Intra-operative bleeding during coblation was significantly less compared the group undergoing cold curettage. Coblator treatment significantly improved patient recovery compared to curettage. Endoscopic coblation adenoidectomy ensures complete removal of adenoids and reduces postoperative adenoid grade. It can also be considered safer because it is under endoscopic control and can reach the cranial portion of the adenoid and its intranasal extension.
Related Concept Videos
Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway
Equipment Required
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques

