Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
Random Error01:04

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Distilling noise characteristics and prior expectations in multisensory causal inference.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Field reliability of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised among life-sentenced prisoners in Sweden: A follow-up study.

Law and human behavior·2026
Same author

Clarifying the conceptual dimensions of representation in neuroscience.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026
Same author

A megastudy of behavioral interventions to catalyze public, political, and financial climate advocacy.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

Dynamics of working memory drift and information flow across the cortical hierarchy.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Introducing the kollaR package: A user-friendly open-access solution for eye-tracking analysis and visualization.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same journal

Thymidylate synthase inhibitory drugs induce p53-dependent pathways differently.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Top-down and bottom-up attention for joint pattern classification and reconstruction.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Short- and long-term scaling behavior of blood pressure and pulse arrival time during sleep in healthy controls and patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Double DQN-based secrecy energy efficiency and fairness performance in IRS-assisted NOMA systems with friendly jamming.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

10 recommendations for strengthening citizen science for improved societal and ecological outcomes: A co-produced analysis of challenges and opportunities in the 21st century.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Paying in public: Peer effects, impression management, and willingness to pay on digital payment platforms.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Probabilistic computation in human perception under variability in encoding precision.

Shaiyan Keshvari1, Ronald van den Berg, Wei Ji Ma

  • 1Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.

Plos One
|July 7, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The brain interprets sensory information, even when noisy. Humans effectively use knowledge of sensory precision, despite its variability, for optimal decision-making.

More Related Videos

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)

Published on: June 3, 2009

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)

Published on: June 3, 2009

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Perception

Background:

  • The brain must interpret noisy sensory input for survival and effective functioning.
  • Optimal performance in perceptual tasks often requires integrating information about the reliability or precision of sensory stimuli.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how the brain encodes sensory information and accounts for its precision.
  • To examine trial-to-trial and item-to-item variability in sensory encoding precision.
  • To determine if human observers utilize knowledge of this precision during perceptual decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • An orientation change detection task was employed.
  • Stimulus reliability was experimentally manipulated using a shape parameter.
  • Behavioral data from human subjects were analyzed to assess performance and decision strategies.

Main Results:

  • Sensory encoding precision showed variability beyond the controlled reliability parameter.
  • Human observers demonstrated near-optimal use of encoding precision information on a trial-by-trial basis.
  • Performance was robust despite inherent variability in sensory information processing.

Conclusions:

  • Sensory information encoding is inherently variable, even when stimulus properties are controlled.
  • The brain exhibits a sophisticated ability to adaptively use knowledge of uncertainty in perceptual decision-making.
  • Findings provide a novel perspective on sensory processing and the brain's management of uncertainty.