Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
A pilot qualitative study to explore stakeholder opinions regarding prescribing quality indicators
Liana Martirosyan1, Joekie Markhorst, Petra Denig
1Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. ld.gross-martirosyan@cbg-meb.nl
Stakeholders find prescribing quality indicators crucial for diabetes care assessment, with preferences varying by user aim. Addressing reasons for treatment deviations can enhance the use of these indicators for quality improvement.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
- Diabetes Care Management
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Prescribing quality information is essential for various stakeholders in diabetes care.
- Understanding stakeholder opinions on prescribing quality indicators is key for their effective implementation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the opinions and preferences of key stakeholders regarding prescribing quality indicators for diabetes care.
- To identify barriers and facilitators for the use of prescribing quality indicators in healthcare quality improvement programs.
Main Methods:
- Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 key informants from eight Dutch healthcare organizations.
- Content analysis was applied to interview transcripts to identify themes related to stakeholder preferences and barriers.
Main Results:
- All stakeholders valued indicators for undertreatment; healthcare providers and policymakers favored safety indicators, insurers prioritized cost indicators, and patient representatives focused on interpersonal aspects.
- A composite score was preferred for initial assessment, but a lack of information on reasons for guideline deviations was a major barrier.
- Stakeholders preferred positive indicator formulations to encourage provider participation.
Conclusions:
- Prescribing quality indicators are valued for diabetes care assessment, but specific preferences differ among stakeholders.
- Implementing systems to record reasons for deviating from treatment guidelines could increase the use of these indicators.
- Study findings can inform the development of larger-scale surveys on quality indicators for diabetes care.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Quality Assurance
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Blind Procedures
Nursing Evaluation
Section...
