Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting01:18

Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting

The guidelines and strategies provided by the American Nurses Association (ANA) and the Canadian Nurses Association (CNA) offer essential principles for ensuring safe and secure computer charting systems in healthcare settings. Let's break down each recommendation:
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management01:21

Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management

Surgical interventions for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, are essential in managing symptoms and addressing complications. The selection of surgical procedures is contingent upon the specific conditions and complications that stem from these illnesses.
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Methods of Documentation V: CBE01:23

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures01:22

Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures

Essential infection prevention measures are based on the knowledge of the infection chain, the modes of transmission in healthcare settings, and the use of the best practices in all healthcare settings. Compulsory public reporting of healthcare-associated infection rates is needed to allow individuals and the community to make informed choices regarding selecting a healthcare facility.
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Standard Precaution01:26

Standard Precaution

Standard precautions are the minimum infection control safeguards used while caring for all patients, irrespective of their disease condition. They help prevent the spread of common infectious microorganisms to healthcare workers, patients, and visitors in all healthcare settings.
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What About the Gallbladder? A Case Series of Experience and Outcomes in Pediatric Ventriculogallbladder Shunts.

The Journal of surgical research·2026
Same author

Correlation of Oxygen Saturation Index with Oxygenation Index in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: in A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

The Journal of pediatrics·2026
Same author

A national analysis of social drivers of health and post-operative outcomes in previously healthy children.

Journal of pediatric surgery·2026
Same author

Subclavian approach without ultrasound guidance is safe and effective for pediatric central venous access.

Journal of pediatric surgery·2026
Same author

Diagnosis of acute appendicitis at a pediatric emergency department within a general hospital.

Emergency radiology·2026
Same author

Transfusion in transit: A decade of prehospital blood transfusion in pediatric trauma.

The journal of trauma and acute care surgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum
06:48

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum

Published on: May 20, 2018

Implementing a surgical checklist: more than checking a box.

Shauna M Levy1, Casey E Senter, Russell B Hawkins

  • 1Center for Surgical Trials and Evidence-based Practice, Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, 77030, USA.

Surgery
|July 10, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Despite 100% reported compliance, a study found that most surgical safety checklist items were not fully executed. This highlights a gap between documented compliance and actual implementation fidelity in perioperative care.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum
06:48

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum

Published on: May 20, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Patient Safety Research
  • Surgical Process Optimization

Background:

  • Perioperative checklists, like the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist, are mandated to reduce patient morbidity and mortality.
  • An adapted checklist showed 100% reported compliance within a hospital system.
  • A hypothesis was formed that 100% compliance does not equate to true implementation fidelity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the actual implementation fidelity of a perioperative checklist.
  • To assess the completion of preincision checklist components through direct observation.
  • To understand staff perception and understanding of the checklist process via survey.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective observational study over 7 weeks.
  • Direct observation of pediatric surgical operations.
  • Post-study survey to assess perception and understanding.

Main Results:

  • 142 pediatric cases observed; 100% reported preincision compliance.
  • No cases fully executed all checklist items; average of 4 of 13 items performed.
  • High performance for patient/procedure confirmation (99%) and "timeout" (97%); others <60%.

Conclusions:

  • Documented 100% compliance masks low implementation fidelity of individual checklist items.
  • Most checkpoints were not executed as designed or at all.
  • Findings suggest potential issues with the implementation and dissemination strategy of the checklist.