Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects and mechanisms of non-restrictive external stent for prevention of vein graft restenosis in a rabbit model.

Chinese medical journal·2010
Same author

Embryonic development of the internal anal sphincter in rats with anorectal malformations.

Journal of pediatric surgery·2010
Same author

[Cluster analysis in micrangium detection in malignant nasal and paranasal sinus tumor].

Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University·2010
Same author

Surgical treatment of early acute thrombosis of mechanical mitral prosthesis.

The heart surgery forum·2010
Same author

The computational model to predict accurately inhibitory activity for inhibitors towards CYP3A4.

Computers in biology and medicine·2010
Same author

Synthesis and anticonvulsant activity of N-3-arylamide substituted 5,5-cyclopropanespirohydantoin derivatives.

European journal of medicinal chemistry·2010

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Predicting nitrogen loading with land-cover composition: how can watershed size affect model performance?

Tao Zhang1, Xiaojun Yang

  • 1Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. tz@ufl.edu

Environmental Management
|July 10, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Regression model performance for predicting pollutant loadings varies with watershed size and landscape heterogeneity. Watershed size directly and indirectly impacts model accuracy, with physiographic factors often more influential than land-cover diversity.

More Related Videos

Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon
09:44

Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon

Published on: October 16, 2018

A Protocol for Conducting Rainfall Simulation to Study Soil Runoff
10:35

A Protocol for Conducting Rainfall Simulation to Study Soil Runoff

Published on: April 3, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon
09:44

Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon

Published on: October 16, 2018

A Protocol for Conducting Rainfall Simulation to Study Soil Runoff
10:35

A Protocol for Conducting Rainfall Simulation to Study Soil Runoff

Published on: April 3, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Environmental science
  • Hydrology
  • Geospatial analysis

Background:

  • Regression models predict in-stream pollutant loadings using land-cover data.
  • Model performance varies significantly across watersheds, often linked to landscape heterogeneity.
  • Larger watersheds generally yield better model performance than smaller ones.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the causes of varying regression model performance across watersheds of different sizes.
  • To test if landscape heterogeneity explains performance variations linked to watershed size.
  • To explore the fundamental mechanisms behind model performance variations.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized neutral landscape modeling and a spatially explicit nutrient loading model.
  • Employed three neutral modeling criteria based on landscape property similarity.
  • Estimated nitrogen loads for real and neutral landscape scenarios to compare model performance.

Main Results:

  • Watershed size directly and indirectly influences regression model performance.
  • Interwatershed landscape heterogeneity is a factor, but not the sole determinant of performance variation.
  • Physiographic properties impacting nitrogen delivery effectiveness were more significant than land-cover heterogeneity.

Conclusions:

  • Watershed size has a direct impact on the predictive accuracy of pollutant loading models.
  • Landscape heterogeneity alone does not fully explain performance variations related to watershed size.
  • Understanding physiographic influences is crucial for improving watershed-scale pollutant loading predictions.