Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...

Current Trends in Nursing II

Current Trends in Nursing II

Trends in nursing are multifactorial and associated with changes in society, within the nursing profession, and in other professions. Notably, telehealth and remote nursing contribute to successful healthcare delivery for numerous patients and help reduce stress for nurses due to nursing shortages. Nurses can reach patients, monitor their conditions, and interact with them using computers, audio, visual accessories, and telephones—for example, remote patient monitoring systems. Likewise,...

Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System

Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System

The issues and trends in healthcare delivery are constantly changing. The COVID-19 pandemic is one recent issue that wreaked havoc on healthcare systems, causing a shortage of healthcare workers, high demand for medicines and supplies, and increased medical expenditure due to a lack of insurance. Other issues include rising healthcare costs and care fragmentation.
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes:

Humanistic Psychology

Humanistic Psychology

Humanistic psychology emerged in the mid-20th century as a response to the deterministic and pessimistic nature of behaviorism and psychoanalysis. While behaviorism focused on observable behaviors influenced by the environment and psychoanalysis delved into unconscious motivations, both theories suggested that human actions lacked free will. In contrast, humanistic psychology offers a perspective that emphasizes the innate potential for goodness and growth within every individual.
This approach...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Age-specific differences in parathyroidectomy after implementation of guidelines for primary hyperparathyroidism.

Gland surgery·2026

Same author

Medical Student Experiences With ChatGPT: National Cross-Sectional Study.

JMIR formative research·2026

Same author

Tumor Location of Uveal Melanoma and Impact on Metastasis-Free Survival in 1001 Cases.

Seminars in ophthalmology·2025

Same author

Formative research and development of a referral toolkit for sexual health services linkages within chicago public high schools.

Evaluation and program planning·2025

Same author

Overview of emerging therapies for demyelinating diseases.

World journal of clinical cases·2024

Same author

HIGH-DOSE INTRAVITREAL TOPOTECAN FOR RECURRENT RETINOBLASTOMA, SUBRETINAL SEEDS, AND VITREOUS SEEDS.

Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Advocacy evaluation: challenges and emerging trends.

David Devlin-Foltz¹, Michael C Fagen, Ehren Reed

¹The Aspen Institute, Washington, DC, USA.

Health Promotion Practice

|July 10, 2012

Summary

Evaluating policy advocacy is crucial for health promotion. Effective advocacy evaluation demonstrates impact beyond activities, justifying funding for policy change initiatives.

More Related Videos

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

Public Health
Health Policy
Social Science Research

Background:

Policy and regulation changes are vital for population health promotion.
Advocacy efforts driving policy change often involve complex processes challenging traditional evaluation.
Resource allocation for policy advocacy requires robust evidence of impact.

Purpose of the Study:

To highlight current challenges in advocacy evaluation.
To introduce new resources for addressing these challenges.
To emphasize the importance of evaluating policy advocacy outcomes.

Main Methods:

Review of recent developments in advocacy evaluation.
Discussion of challenges faced by advocacy evaluators.
Presentation of new resources for evaluation.

Main Results:

Advocacy evaluation assesses strategic learning, capacity building, and community organizing.
Moving beyond activity inventories to outcome demonstration is key.
New resources are available to aid evaluators.

Conclusions:

Effective advocacy evaluation is essential for demonstrating the value of policy change efforts.
Addressing current challenges can improve the rigor and utility of advocacy evaluations.
Investing in robust evaluation strengthens the case for policy advocacy funding.