Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Variation01:19

Variation

An important characteristic of any set of data is the variation in the data. In some data sets, the data values are concentrated closely near the mean; in other data sets, the data values are more widely spread out from the mean. The most common measure of variation, or spread, is the standard deviation, which is the square root of variance.
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
The...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bridging the divide in motor learning research.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Consensus Paper: Models of Cerebellar Functions.

Cerebellum (London, England)·2026
Same author

Coordination of spike timing among the neurons of the cerebellum.

Research square·2026
Same author

A neural language for the cerebellum: control of behavior via competing populations of Purkinje cells.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same author

Coordination of spike timing among the neurons of the cerebellum.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Separating the control of moving and holding in human post-stroke arm paresis.

eLife·2025
Same journal

Deep Learning Reveals Cross-Modal Neural Representations of Auditory and Visual Mental Imagery in MEG.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Speech sensorimotor adaptation in young adult cochlear implant users with early implantation.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

How Visual Context Influences Lateral Stepping Regulation While Walking on Winding Paths.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Simultaneous neuron evidence for much higher covariation with saccadic reaction time of superior colliculus than primary visual cortex visual responses.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Separate Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Regions Participate in Distinct Large-Scale Networks Differentially Recruited for Social and Cognitive Control Functions.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Comprehensive Analysis of Auditory Nerve Fiber Responses using Fiber-Specific Modeling.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles
09:27

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles

Published on: August 25, 2020

Sensitivity to prediction error in reach adaptation.

Mollie K Marko1, Adrian M Haith, Michelle D Harran

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. mkmarko@jhu.edu

Journal of Neurophysiology
|July 10, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Motor learning adapts less effectively to large sensory prediction errors than to small ones. This study reveals that error sensitivity decreases with larger error magnitudes, impacting motor adaptation and potentially explaining cerebellar complex spike activity.

More Related Videos

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior
05:05

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Published on: December 2, 2022

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles
09:27

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles

Published on: August 25, 2020

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior
05:05

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Published on: December 2, 2022

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Learning and Memory

Background:

  • The brain predicts movement outcomes and uses sensory feedback to detect and correct errors.
  • Motor adaptation is driven by error signals, but the precise relationship between error magnitude and learning remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how error magnitude influences motor adaptation sensitivity in human reaching movements.
  • To explore the neural encoding of error sensitivity, specifically examining the role of cerebellar complex spikes (CSs).

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed reaching movements with manipulated visual and proprioceptive feedback errors of varying magnitudes.
  • Single-trial adaptation was measured, and sensitivity to error was calculated as the ratio of motor command change to error size.
  • Previously published data on psychophysical results and cerebellar complex spike probabilities were reanalyzed.

Main Results:

  • Sensitivity to sensory prediction errors decreased significantly as the magnitude of the error increased for both visual and proprioceptive feedback.
  • This error-dependent sensitivity was also observed in reanalyzed psychophysical data.
  • The probability of cerebellar complex spikes (CSs) declined with increasing error size, suggesting CSs may encode error sensitivity rather than error itself.

Conclusions:

  • Motor adaptation exhibits reduced sensitivity to larger sensory prediction errors, implying a non-linear learning process.
  • Cerebellar complex spikes may represent the brain's sensitivity to error, offering a potential explanation for their varied roles in motor learning and error processing.