Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Molecular Models02:00

Molecular Models

Physical models representing molecular architectures of chemical compounds play essential roles in understanding chemistry. The use of molecular models makes it easier to visualize the structures and shapes of atoms and molecules.
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design01:28

Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design

Drug design is a dynamic field that involves discovering and developing new medications based on specific biological targets. This process heavily relies on structure-activity relationships (SAR) and quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) to guide the design and optimization of efficient drugs.
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence its...
VSEPR Theory02:37

VSEPR Theory

Valence shell electron-pair repulsion theory (VSEPR theory) enables us to predict the molecular structure around a central atom from an examination of the number of bonds and lone electron pairs in its Lewis structure. The VSEPR model assumes that electron pairs in the valence shell of a central atom will adopt an arrangement that minimizes repulsions between these electron pairs by maximizing the distance between them. The electrons in the valence shell of a central atom form either bonding...
VSEPR Theory and the Basic Shapes02:52

VSEPR Theory and the Basic Shapes

Overview of VSEPR Theory
Newman Projections02:06

Newman Projections

Different notations are used to represent the three-dimensional structure of molecules on two-dimensional surfaces. One of the most commonly used representations is the dash-wedge formula. The dashed wedges, solid wedges, and the plane lines indicate the groups situated behind the plane, coming out of the plane, and in the plane, respectively.
The organic molecules rotate across the single bonds leading to numerous temporary three-dimensional structures of varying energy known as conformers.
Structures of Solids02:22

Structures of Solids

Solids in which the atoms, ions, or molecules are arranged in a definite repeating pattern are known as crystalline solids. Metals and ionic compounds typically form ordered, crystalline solids. A crystalline solid has a precise melting temperature because each atom or molecule of the same type is held in place with the same forces or energy. Amorphous solids or non-crystalline solids (or, sometimes, glasses) which lack an ordered internal structure and are randomly arranged. Substances that...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mechanistic model for prediction of formate dehydrogenase kinetics under industrially relevant conditions.

Biotechnology progress·2009
Same author

Model-based control of MF/UF filtration processes: pilot plant implementation and results.

Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research·2009
Same author

Three-dimensional lattice Monte Carlo simulations of model proteins. IV. Proteins at an oil-water interface.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2006
Same author

Lipoic acid in multiple sclerosis: a pilot study.

Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)·2005
Same author

Treatment of landfill leachate--high tech or low tech? A case study.

Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research·2004
Same author

3D-Lattice Monte Carlo simulations of model proteins. Size effects on folding thermodynamics and kinetics.

Biophysical chemistry·2003

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

Quaternary Structure Modeling Through Chemical Cross-Linking Mass Spectrometry: Extending TX-MS Jupyter Reports
05:18

Quaternary Structure Modeling Through Chemical Cross-Linking Mass Spectrometry: Extending TX-MS Jupyter Reports

Published on: October 20, 2021

What is wrong with quantitative structure-property relations models based on three-dimensional descriptors?

M Hechinger1, K Leonhard, W Marquardt

  • 1AVT-Process Systems Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, 52064 Aachen, Germany.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
|July 11, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Using simplified molecular structures or methods for quantitative structure-property relations (QSPR) can lead to inaccurate predictions. Ensuring accurate 3D molecular data is crucial for reliable QSPR analysis and property prediction.

More Related Videos

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

Quaternary Structure Modeling Through Chemical Cross-Linking Mass Spectrometry: Extending TX-MS Jupyter Reports
05:18

Quaternary Structure Modeling Through Chemical Cross-Linking Mass Spectrometry: Extending TX-MS Jupyter Reports

Published on: October 20, 2021

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Cheminformatics
  • Molecular modeling

Background:

  • Quantitative structure-property relations (QSPR) utilize 3D molecular descriptors for property prediction.
  • Current QSPR practices lack a standardized understanding of the required molecular structure detail and computational methods.
  • Variability in computational approaches, from molecular mechanics to ab initio methods, introduces heterogeneity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the error introduced by varying computational methods and structural detail in 3D QSPR.
  • To evaluate the impact of different molecular structure representations on descriptor values.
  • To highlight the need for standardization in 3D QSPR methodology.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluation of widely used 3D molecular descriptors.
  • Comparison of descriptor values derived from molecular structures computed using diverse computational methods.
  • Assessment of structures generated with varying levels of computational rigor.

Main Results:

  • Exclusive use of the most stable molecular conformation leads to systematically erroneous descriptor values.
  • Oversimplified computational methods yield misleading information for structure-property relations.
  • Significant discrepancies in descriptor values were observed across different computational approaches.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of computational method and the degree of structural detail significantly impact 3D QSPR results.
  • Reliance on simplified models or single conformations can lead to erroneous property predictions.
  • Raising awareness about these methodological limitations is essential for the broader acceptance of 3D QSPR.