Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Analysing clinical decision analyses.

J D Habbema1, P M Bossuyt, D W Dippel

  • 1Centre for Clinical Decision Analysis, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Statistics in Medicine
|November 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Decision analysis in the clinical neurosciences: a systematic review of the literature.

European journal of neurology·2013
Same author

Compliance with and short-term adverse events from clarithromycin versus placebo in patients with stable coronary heart disease: the CLARICOR trial.

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy·2009
Same author

The Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool versus alternative tests for selecting postmenopausal women for bone mineral density assessment: a comparative systematic review of accuracy.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2008
Same author

Lowering body temperature in acute ischemic stroke without artificial ventilation and heavy sedation: a feasibility study.

Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association·2007
Same author

Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.

International journal of epidemiology·2007
Same author

Correction: interpretation of random effects meta-analysis in decision models.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2007

This review critically examines clinical decision analysis for screening familial intracranial aneurysms. It proposes robust methods for assessing decision trees and uncertainty, enhancing diagnostic accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Decision Analysis
  • Medical Screening

Background:

  • Clinical decision analysis is crucial for medical screening, but its application and assessment methods require refinement.
  • Screening for familial intracranial aneurysms presents complex decision-making challenges.
  • Current methods for building and assessing decision trees lack rigorous validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically review clinical decision analysis methods applied to familial intracranial aneurysm screening.
  • To present and assess methods for evaluating decision trees and quantifying uncertainty.
  • To explore various forms of sensitivity analysis for improved decision modeling.

Main Methods:

  • Critical review of existing clinical decision analysis literature.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of decision analysis to screening for familial intracranial aneurysms.
  • Detailed discussion and categorization of sensitivity analysis techniques.
  • Main Results:

    • Decision tree assessment methods offer powerful checks on intuitive construction.
    • Sensitivity analysis encompasses various techniques beyond standard evaluation.
    • Identified and named distinct forms of sensitivity analysis: influence, threshold, full Bayesian, Bayesian influence, attribute, generalization, and scenario analysis.

    Conclusions:

    • Methodological improvements in decision analysis and sensitivity analysis are needed.
    • The biostatistical community can significantly contribute to advancing these methods.
    • Adoption of advanced statistical techniques beyond the standard is encouraged for better decision modeling.