Modeling and predicting clinical efficacy for drugs targeting the tumor milieu

Mallika Singh1, Napoleone Ferrara

  • 1Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Emeryville, California, USA. mallika.singh@novartis.com

Nature Biotechnology
|July 12, 2012
PubMed

Insights

Improving cancer models is crucial as many late-stage trials fail. Lessons from anti-angiogenic drug studies in mice can enhance preclinical cancer research and drug development.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Translational Medicine
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Late-stage clinical trials for cancer therapeutics frequently yield disappointing results, highlighting a critical need for more predictive animal tumor models.
  • The development of drugs targeting the tumor microenvironment, rather than tumor cells directly, introduces complexities in preclinical study design and interpretation.
  • A significant gap exists between the efficacy observed in preclinical cancer models and clinical outcomes, impacting drug development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the lessons learned from two decades of comparing clinical efficacy of anti-angiogenic drugs with their preclinical studies.
  • To propose improvements for the design and interpretation of preclinical efficacy studies in existing mouse models.
  • To explore how recent technological and logistical advances in mouse models of human cancer can enhance clinical translatability.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of preclinical data and clinical trial outcomes for anti-angiogenic drugs over the past 20 years.
  • Review of technological and logistical advancements in mouse models of human cancer within the last five years.
  • Literature review and synthesis of findings related to cancer therapeutics targeting the tumor microenvironment.

Main Results:

  • Historical comparisons reveal valuable insights into the limitations of current preclinical models for predicting clinical success of anti-angiogenic therapies.
  • Specific experimental design elements and interpretation strategies can be refined based on past discrepancies between preclinical and clinical results.
  • Recent innovations in mouse cancer models offer enhanced potential for increased clinical translatability.

Conclusions:

  • Refining preclinical cancer models and study designs, informed by past clinical trial data, is essential for improving the success rate of cancer therapeutics.
  • Leveraging advancements in mouse models and focusing on tumor microenvironment interactions can lead to more predictive preclinical studies.
  • Enhanced translatability of animal studies is achievable through strategic improvements in model selection and experimental methodology.