Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

Mechanical Ventilation Boot Camp Curriculum
Published on: March 12, 2018
Evaluation of 4 new generation portable ventilators
Thomas C Blakeman1, Richard D Branson
1Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA. Thomas.Blakeman@uc.edu
This study evaluated four portable ventilators for patient transport, assessing triggering, tidal volume, battery life, and oxygen accuracy. While all devices delivered accurate tidal volumes, two struggled with precise fraction of inspired oxygen delivery.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Respiratory Care
- Medical Device Evaluation
Background:
- Portable ventilators are crucial for patient transport within and between hospitals.
- Evaluating device performance is essential for ensuring patient safety during transit.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of four leading portable ventilators: Impact EMV, CareFusion LTV 1200, Newport HT70, and Hamilton T1.
- To assess key performance metrics including triggering, delivered tidal volume (V(T)) accuracy, battery duration, delivered fraction of inspired oxygen (F(IO(2))) accuracy, and gas consumption.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a microprocessor-controlled breathing simulator to test triggering under varying inspiratory efforts (-2, -4, -8 cm H2O).
- Evaluated delivered V(T) and F(IO(2)) accuracy across operational ranges.
- Determined gas consumption by measuring oxygen depletion from a cylinder at F(IO(2)) 1.0.
- Assessed battery duration by operating ventilators at F(IO(2)) 0.21 until device failure.
Main Results:
- Gas consumption varied significantly, ranging from 9.2 to 16 L/min.
- Battery durations showed wide variability, from 101 to 640 minutes.
- Triggering performance differed between devices but was consistent within each device.
- F(IO(2)) accuracy was compromised in two devices at specific V(T) settings and ranges.
Conclusions:
- Portable ventilator technology continues to advance, with all tested devices demonstrating effective tidal volume delivery.
- Two ventilators exhibited inaccuracies in delivering the fraction of inspired oxygen across various settings.
- No single portable ventilator emerged as superior across all evaluated performance parameters.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV)
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement: