Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Left atrial structure and function and clinical outcomes in the general population
Sachin Gupta1, Susan A Matulevicius, Colby R Ayers
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, 75390-9047, USA.
Left atrial emptying fraction (LAEF) is a superior predictor of mortality compared to maximum LA volume (LAmax/BSA). LAEF provides incremental prognostic value for adverse outcomes in the general population.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Biomarkers
Background:
- Left atrial (LA) structural and functional abnormalities can represent subclinical phenotypes.
- These abnormalities may identify individuals at increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the associations of LA maximum volume indexed to body surface area (LAmax/BSA) and LA emptying fraction (LAEF) with cardiovascular risk factors and left ventricular (LV) structure and function.
- To evaluate the incremental prognostic value of LAmax/BSA and LAEF beyond traditional risk factors and LV parameters for mortality.
Main Methods:
- Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) was used to measure LAmax/BSA and LAEF in 1802 participants from the Dallas Heart Study.
- Linear regression and Cox proportional-hazards models were employed to analyze associations with risk factors, LV parameters, and mortality.
- The incremental prognostic value was assessed by comparing c-statistics before and after adding LA parameters to established risk models.
Main Results:
- Both increasing LAmax/BSA and decreasing LAEF were associated with hypertension and elevated natriuretic peptide levels.
- LAmax/BSA was strongly associated with LV end-diastolic volume/BSA, while LAEF correlated with LV ejection fraction and concentricity.
- Decreasing LAEF, but not increasing LAmax/BSA, was independently associated with increased mortality (HR per 1 SD: 1.56; P < 0.001).
- LAEF significantly improved the c-statistic for mortality prediction (0.78 vs. 0.77; P < 0.05), whereas LAmax/BSA did not (0.76; P = 0.20).
Conclusions:
- LAmax/BSA and LAEF are significant subclinical phenotypes in the general population.
- LAEF demonstrates superior and incremental prognostic value for mortality compared to LAmax/BSA.
- LAEF is a valuable biomarker for identifying individuals at higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events.
Related Concept Videos
Chambers of the Heart
Deoxygenated blood from the body is received in the right...
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Overview of the Heart
The heart's structure...
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification

