Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

13:35
Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024
Breast Reconstruction with Microvascular MS-TRAM and DIEP Flaps
1Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Archives of Plastic Surgery
|July 12, 2012
Summary
Free muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps offer excellent breast reconstruction options. These abdominal tissue transfers provide aesthetic results with minimal donor site issues.
Area of Science:
- Plastic Surgery
- Reconstructive Surgery
- Oncology
Background:
- Breast reconstruction aims to restore aesthetics and symmetry post-mastectomy.
- Abdominal free flaps are a common choice for breast mound reconstruction.
- Muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps are widely utilized.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the suitability and outcomes of free MS-TRAM and DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction.
- To highlight the advantages of these techniques regarding aesthetics and donor-site morbidity.
Main Methods:
- Review of surgical techniques for free MS-TRAM and DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
- Analysis of flap characteristics, including blood supply and shaping capabilities.
- Assessment of donor-site outcomes and patient satisfaction.
Main Results:
- Free flaps offer robust blood supply, reducing fat necrosis risk.
- Aggressive flap shaping allows for optimized aesthetic outcomes.
- MS-TRAM and DIEP flaps typically require minimal donor-site tissue sacrifice.
Conclusions:
- Free MS-TRAM and DIEP flaps are well-suited for breast reconstruction.
- These techniques provide aesthetically pleasing results with minimal donor-site morbidity.
- Proper patient selection and surgical technique are crucial for successful outcomes.