Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity01:25

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...
Toxicity Testing in Animals01:23

Toxicity Testing in Animals

Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

DNA Oxidation and Expression of Repair Enzymes in Organ- Cultured Human Limbal Epithelium.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

The comet assay as a tool for human biomonitoring of exposure to environmental and occupational agents - A summary of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Mutation research. Reviews in mutation research·2026
Same author

A Landscape Analysis of Human SUMOylation.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2026
Same author

Rare variants in embryonic development and cell signalling genes in syndromic and non-syndromic orofacial clefts: evidence from a Colombian Caribbean cohort.

Journal of human genetics·2026
Same author

The comet assay as a tool in human biomonitoring exposure to antineoplastic drugs - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mutation research. Reviews in mutation research·2026
Same author

Towards a validation of the standard and enzyme-linked comet assay: a retrospective variability analysis.

Archives of toxicology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure
08:25

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure

Published on: June 5, 2020

Can standard genotoxicity tests be applied to nanoparticles?

Zuzana Magdolenova1, Yolanda Lorenzo, Andrew Collins

  • 1NILU-Norwegian Institute for Air Research, CEE, Health Effects Group, Kjeller, Norway.

Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. Part A
|July 14, 2012
PubMed
Summary

This study validates genotoxicity tests for nanoparticles (NP). Researchers found that while the comet assay and micronucleus (MN) test can be reliable, specific protocols must be followed to prevent false results with NP exposure.

More Related Videos

Demonstration of the DNA Fiber Assay for Investigating DNA Damage and Repair Dynamics Induced by Nanoparticles
13:09

Demonstration of the DNA Fiber Assay for Investigating DNA Damage and Repair Dynamics Induced by Nanoparticles

Published on: March 3, 2023

A Silver Nanoparticle Method for Ameliorating Biliary Atresia Syndrome in Mice
07:48

A Silver Nanoparticle Method for Ameliorating Biliary Atresia Syndrome in Mice

Published on: October 13, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure
08:25

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure

Published on: June 5, 2020

Demonstration of the DNA Fiber Assay for Investigating DNA Damage and Repair Dynamics Induced by Nanoparticles
13:09

Demonstration of the DNA Fiber Assay for Investigating DNA Damage and Repair Dynamics Induced by Nanoparticles

Published on: March 3, 2023

A Silver Nanoparticle Method for Ameliorating Biliary Atresia Syndrome in Mice
07:48

A Silver Nanoparticle Method for Ameliorating Biliary Atresia Syndrome in Mice

Published on: October 13, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Nanotechnology
  • Toxicology
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Genotoxicity testing is crucial for nanoparticle (NP) safety assessment.
  • Common assays like the comet assay and micronucleus (MN) test face challenges with NP interference.
  • Understanding these interferences is vital for accurate NP risk evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the validity of the comet assay and MN test for nanoparticle genotoxicity.
  • To identify and address potential sources of false positive and false negative results in these assays when using NPs.
  • To establish optimized protocols for reliable NP genotoxicity testing.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the comet assay to detect DNA strand breaks induced by various NPs.
  • Employed a modified comet assay with formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (FPG) to assess oxidized purines.
  • Applied the micronucleus (MN) test, incorporating cytochalasin B (CB), to evaluate chromosomal damage from NP exposure.

Main Results:

  • The comet assay showed minimal false positives with NP, except for oleic acid-coated Fe₃O₄ NPs.
  • Modified comet assay confirmed NP presence did not interfere with FPG detection of oxidized purines.
  • MN assay results were affected by CB's inhibition of endocytosis, necessitating pre-treatment with NP before CB addition.

Conclusions:

  • The comet assay and MN test can be valid for NP genotoxicity assessment with appropriate modifications.
  • Careful consideration of NP-cell interactions and assay conditions is essential to avoid false results.
  • Optimized protocols ensure the accurate evaluation of nanoparticle-induced genotoxicity.