Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Is there a need to redo many of the diagnoses of hypertension?
José Marcos Thalenberg1, Bráulio Luna Filho, Maria Teresa Nogueira Bombig
1Blood Pressure Monitoring Service, Hypertensive Cardiopathy Clinic, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Tupi 397, São Paulo, Brazil. jm@thalenberg.com
Insights
Overdiagnosis of hypertension is common in treated patients. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring after drug withdrawal accurately reclassifies many presumed hypertensive individuals.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Hypertension Research
- Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
Background:
- Hypertension diagnosis often relies on office blood pressure (BP) measurements.
- This can lead to overdiagnosis, particularly in patients undergoing treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To re-evaluate the diagnosis of treated hypertensive patients using new clinical measurements and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM).
- To assess the accuracy of traditional BP measurement methods versus ABPM in a treated hypertensive cohort.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving 101 patients undergoing antihypertensive treatment.
- Patients underwent drug withdrawal for 2-3 weeks, followed by repeated office BP measurements and ABPM.
- Standardized BP thresholds were used for diagnosing hypertension, white-coat hypertension, and normotension.
Main Results:
- Of 101 subjects, 63% were confirmed hypertensive, 28% had white-coat hypertension, and 9% were normotensive.
- Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring revealed that 37% of initially presumed hypertensive patients were not confirmed as such after re-evaluation.
- No cases of masked hypertension were identified.
Conclusions:
- Hypertension is frequently overdiagnosed in patients undergoing treatment.
- Implementing new diagnostic procedures, including drug withdrawal and BP monitoring, is crucial for accurate hypertension diagnosis.
Context And Objective:
Most hypertensive subjects undergoing treatment were diagnosed solely through measurements made in the consultation office. The objective of this study was to redo the diagnosis of treated patients after new clinical measurements and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM).
Design And Setting:
Cross-sectional study conducted in an outpatient specialty clinic.
Methods:
Patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension or undergoing anti-hypertensive treatment, without target organ damage or diabetes, were included. After drug withdrawal lasting 2-3 weeks, new blood pressure (BP) measurements were made during two separate visits. ABPM was performed blindly, in relation to clinical measurements. The BP thresholds used for diagnosing hypertension, white-coat hypertension, normotension and masked hypertension were: 140 (systolic) and 90 (diastolic) mmHg for office measurements and 135 (systolic) and 85 (diastolic) mmHg for mean awake ABPM (MAA).
Results:
Evaluations were done on 101 subjects (70% women); mean age 51 ± 10 years. The clinical BP was 155 ± 18/97 ± 10 mmHg (first visit) and 150 ± 16/94 ± 11 mmHg (second visit); MAA was 137 ± 13/ 86 ± 10 mmHg. Sixty-four patients (63%) were confirmed as hypertensive, 28 (28%) as white-coat hypertensive, nine (9%) as normotensive and none as masked hypertensive. After ABPM, 37% of the presumed hypertensive patients did not fit into this category.
Conclusion:
This study showed that hypertension was overdiagnosed among hypertensive subjects undergoing treatment. New diagnostic procedures should be performed after drug withdrawal, with the aid of BP monitoring.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension I: Introduction
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Hypertension V: Nursing Management
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications