Clinical experience treating Paecilomyces lilacinus keratitis in four patients

Yu Monden1, Minoru Sugita, Ryoji Yamakawa

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.

Abstract

Insights

Paecilomyces lilacinus keratitis may not always require voriconazole. This study suggests voriconazole is best for patients with diabetes or prior corticosteroid use, while others may improve with alternative treatments.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Mycology
  • Infectious Diseases

Background:

  • Paecilomyces lilacinus is a fungus that can cause keratitis.
  • Voriconazole is a common antifungal treatment for P. lilacinus keratitis.
  • However, not all patients require voriconazole for successful treatment.

Observation:

  • A retrospective review of four P. lilacinus keratitis cases was conducted.
  • Two severe cases with diabetes and corticosteroid use required long-term voriconazole.
  • Two milder cases without these risk factors improved with shorter, alternative treatments.

Findings:

  • P. lilacinus keratitis can be resolved with treatments other than voriconazole.
  • Voriconazole effectiveness was noted in severe, refractory cases.
  • Shorter treatment durations were effective in cases without diabetes or corticosteroid use.

Implications:

  • Voriconazole should be reserved for P. lilacinus keratitis patients with specific risk factors like diabetes or corticosteroid use.
  • Alternative antifungal strategies may be sufficient for less severe cases.
  • This finding can help optimize antifungal therapy and reduce unnecessary drug exposure.

Related Concept Videos