Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...

Estimation of the Physical Quantities

Estimation of the Physical Quantities

On many occasions, physicists, other scientists, and engineers need to make estimates of a particular quantity. These are sometimes referred to as guesstimates, order-of-magnitude approximations, back-of-the-envelope calculations, or Fermi calculations. The physicist Enrico Fermi was famous for his ability to estimate various kinds of data with surprising precision. Estimating does not mean guessing a number or a formula at random. Instead, estimation means using prior experience and sound...

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

Cause and Effect

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

Relating Angular And Linear Quantities - II

Relating Angular And Linear Quantities - II

In the case of circular motion, the linear tangential speed of a particle at a radius from the axis of rotation is related to the angular velocity by the relation:

Relating Angular And Linear Quantities - I

Relating Angular And Linear Quantities - I

If the rotational definitions are compared with the definitions of linear kinematic variables from motion along a straight line and motion in two and three dimensions, we can observe a mapping of the linear variables to the rotational ones.
When comparing the linear and rotational variables individually, the linear variable of position has physical units of meters, whereas the angular position variable has dimensionless units of radians, as it is the ratio of two lengths. The linear velocity...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Seasonal Trends in the Abundance of Eurasian Woodcock Populations Monitored Using "Beccapp" in Apulia, and the Age Structure of Shot Birds.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2026

Same author

Sensor-Based Precision Feeding Systems in Animal Production: Technologies and Applications.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2026

Same author

Impact of genetic composition on cows' metabolic and fertility responses to thermal stress.

International journal of biometeorology·2026

Same author

DNA Barcoding and Analysis of Nutritional Properties as a Tool for Enhancing Traceability of Anchovies (<i>Engraulis encrasicolus</i> L.) Fished in the Italian Southern Adriatic Sea.

Genes·2025

Same author

Prevalence, Species Diversity, and Risk Factors of Tick Infestation in Cattle From District Peshawar, Pakistan.

Veterinary medicine and science·2025

Same author

Flesh Quality, Shelf Life, and Freshness Assessment of Sea Bream Reared in a Coastal Mediterranean Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture System.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

Preferences and illusions in quantified spatial relational reasoning.

Marco Ragni¹, Tobias Sonntag

¹Center for Cognitive Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. ragni@cognition.uni-freiburg.de

Cognitive Processing

|July 18, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Human reasoning preferences show a bias towards grouped models and parsimonious strategies. Errors in spatial reasoning are linked to specific quantifiers and logical connectors like XOR.

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Three-Dimensional Mapping of the Rotation of Interactive Virtual Objects with Eye-Tracking Data

Three-Dimensional Mapping of the Rotation of Interactive Virtual Objects with Eye-Tracking Data

Published on: October 18, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Three-Dimensional Mapping of the Rotation of Interactive Virtual Objects with Eye-Tracking Data

Three-Dimensional Mapping of the Rotation of Interactive Virtual Objects with Eye-Tracking Data

Published on: October 18, 2024

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Human Reasoning
Spatial Cognition

Background:

Understanding human reasoning processes is crucial for cognitive science.
Spatial relational assertions involve complex logical structures.
Previous research has explored mental models but less on quantified spatial relations.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate human strategies and preferences in reasoning about quantified spatial relational assertions.
To identify systematic errors and their causes in this reasoning process.
To analyze the impact of quantifiers and logical connectors on reasoning accuracy.

Main Methods:

Empirical study involving participants reasoning about spatial assertions.
Analysis of participants' model construction strategies.
Statistical analysis of error rates associated with different logical connectors and quantifiers.

Main Results:

A clear preference for specific mental models was observed, influenced by mental model operations.
Participants favored grouped elements and parsimonious representation strategies.
Reasoning errors were significantly higher with exclusive OR (XOR) compared to AND.
Error rates increased as the use of universal quantifiers (e.g., 'All') decreased.

Conclusions:

Human reasoning about quantified spatial relations is influenced by model preferences and simplification strategies.
Logical connectors and quantifiers play a critical role in the accuracy of spatial reasoning.
Specific quantifiers and connectors, rather than assertion complexity, are the primary source of reasoning difficulties.