Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...

Kaplan-Meier Approach

Kaplan-Meier Approach

The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...

The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test

The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test

The Mantel-Cox log-rank test is a widely used statistical method for comparing the survival distributions of two groups. It tests whether a statistically significant difference exists in survival times between the groups without assuming a specific distribution for the survival data, making it a non-parametric test. This flexibility makes the log-rank test particularly valuable in medical research and other fields where the timing of an event, such as death or disease recurrence, is of interest.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Longitudinal Predictors of Dental Caries, Periodontal Disease and Oral Health Quality of Life in People with HIV on ART: The OHART study.

Research square·2026

Same author

Do Prolonged Donor Warm Ischemic Times Correlate with Kidney Transplant Outcomes? The Largest Study of Donation After Circulatory Death Donors in the United States.

Transplantation·2026

Same author

A Novel Measurement of Altered Achilles Subtendon Load Sharing 6-12 Months Following Rupture.

Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society·2026

Same author

Semiparametric regression methods for temporal processes subject to multiple sources of censoring.

The Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique·2026

Same author

Cognitive impairment is associated with poorer oral health in people with HIV: evidence from a pilot study.

Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985)·2025

Same author

Low prevalence of glomerulonephritis in transplanted kidneys from deceased donors with active hepatitis C virus infection.

Kidney international·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Contrasting treatment-specific survival using double-robust estimators.

Min Zhang¹, Douglas E Schaubel

¹Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA. mzhang@umich.edu

Statistics in Medicine

|July 19, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces novel methods to estimate treatment effects on survival using observational data, combining two existing approaches for improved accuracy. The methods are double robust, enhancing reliability in complex medical research.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Epidemiology
Health Services Research

Background:

Randomized trials are often infeasible for comparing treatment-specific survival.
Observational data are frequently used, necessitating methods to handle covariate imbalances.
Existing methods for estimating Average Causal Effect (ACE) on survival have limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose novel, double robust methods for estimating the Average Causal Effect (ACE) on survival using observational data.
To combine strengths of Cox-regression-based and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) methods.
To estimate ACE with respect to restricted mean survival time (RMST).

Main Methods:

Developed methods that are double robust, requiring only one of two working regression models (logistic for treatment, Cox for death hazard) to be correctly specified.
Integrated Cox-regression-based survival function estimation with IPTW for covariate balancing.
Estimated ACE for restricted mean survival time (RMST) up to a prespecified time point.
Evaluated methods through simulation studies and asymptotic results.

Main Results:

The proposed double robust methods provide consistent estimation of ACE on survival.
Simulation results demonstrate the performance and validity of the developed estimators.
Application to donation-after-cardiac-death kidney transplantation data from the Netherlands.

Conclusions:

The proposed combined estimators offer a robust approach for causal inference on survival from observational data.
These methods are valuable when randomized trials are not feasible.
The study successfully applied the methods to a real-world clinical scenario, demonstrating their practical utility.