Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
The eyes don't have it: lie detection and Neuro-Linguistic Programming
Richard Wiseman1, Caroline Watt, Leanne ten Brinke
1School of Psychology, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
Proponents of Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) claim that certain eye-movements are reliable indicators of lying. According to this notion, a person looking up to their right suggests a lie whereas looking up to their left is indicative of truth telling. Despite widespread belief in this claim, no previous research has examined its validity. In Study 1 the eye movements of participants who were lying or telling the truth were coded, but did not match the NLP patterning. In Study 2 one group of participants were told about the NLP eye-movement hypothesis whilst a second control group were not. Both groups then undertook a lie detection test. No significant differences emerged between the two groups. Study 3 involved coding the eye movements of both liars and truth tellers taking part in high profile press conferences. Once again, no significant differences were discovered. Taken together the results of the three studies fail to support the claims of NLP. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Understanding Deception
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Prosopagnosia
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Non-Verbal Cues
Dark Triad and Person Perception

