Feedback about more accurate versus less accurate trials: differential effects on self-confidence and activation
Rokhsareh Badami1, Mohammad VaezMousavi, Gabriele Wulf
1Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran. rokhsareh.badami@gmail.com
Abstract:
One purpose of the present study was to examine whether self-confidence or anxiety would be differentially affected byfeedback from more accurate rather than less accurate trials. The second purpose was to determine whether arousal variations (activation) would predict performance. On day 1, participants performed a golf putting task under one of two conditions: one group received feedback on the most accurate trials, whereas another group received feedback on the least accurate trials. On day 2, participants completed an anxiety questionnaire and performed a retention test. Shin conductance level, as a measure of arousal, was determined. The results indicated that feedback about more accurate trials resulted in more effective learning as well as increased self-confidence. Also, activation was a predictor of performance.
More Related Videos
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
05:21Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
Published on: January 7, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison
Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback
